Creating Sustainable Value (CSV) and innovation process under Stakeholder Theory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This article aims to look at how organizations seek to improve their competitiveness through the development of a model that integrates the management and systemic practice form with which relate the economic, social and environmental areas, processes and engagement of stakeholders or interested parties, in the context of sustainability and value of innovation. Methodologically, the study may be considered exploratory and descriptive in relation to the purposes and regards the bibliographic resources. Further, organizations seek to interact in a competitive environment, and through the model of Sustainable value of Hart and Milstein, the innovation and the parties concerned, respectively, with the central point generating sustainable values. Finally. the engagement of stakeholders become increasingly important strategic for enterprises and show how the global challenges associated with sustainable development, working collaboratively, as well as can help to identify strategies through sustainable practices. The article concludes that several successful models of the sustainable generation of value, are possible because of the economic, environmental and social dimensions.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. (2008) Sistemas de Gestão da Qualidade – Requisitos: ABNT NBR ISO 9001. Rio de Janeiro. 28 p.
BARBIERI, J. C. S. (2004) Organizações inovadoras: estudos e casos brasileiros. Rio de Janeiro: FGV,.
BARBIERI, J. C. S. (1990) Produção e transferência de tecnologia. São Paulo: Ática S.A.
BARBIERI, J. C. S.; SIMANTOB, M. A. (Org.) (2007). Organizações inovadoras sustentáveis: uma reflexão sobre o futuro das organizações. São Paulo: Atlas.
BARBIERI, J. C. S. et al. (2010) Inovação e sustentabilidade: novos modelos e proposições. Rev. adm. Empresas, v. 50, n. 2, p. 146-154.
BESSANT, J.; TID, J. (2009) Inovação e Empreendedorismo. Trad. Elizamari Rodrigues Becker, Gabriela Perizzolo, Patrícia Lessa Flores da Cunha. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
BORENSTEIN, C. R. (1999) Regulação e gestão competitiva em setores de infra-estrutura: a procura de um equilíbrio dinâmico. Revista de Administração Pública: FGV, v. 33, n. 4, p. 47-91.
CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2006) Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting From. Harvard Business.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M. (1997) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
CHOCTEAU, V.; DRAKE, D.; KLEINDORFER, P.; ORSATO, R.; ROSET, A. (2011) Sustainable Fleet Operations in the Postal Sector. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2011/32/TOM/INSEAD Social Innovation Centre. Avaliable: http://ssrn.com/abstract/. Access may 08, 2015.
CLARO, P. B.O.; CLARO, D. P. (2014) Sustentabilidade estratégica: existe retorno no longo prazo?. Rev. Adm. São Paulo, v. 49, n. 2, p. 291-306.
CRIBB, A. Y. (2007) Artigo Mudança cultural coletiva: o pré-requisito da inovação no Brasil. Publicação Jornal da Ciência, Disponível em http://www.protec.org.br/ artigos.asp. Access may12, 2015.
DOSI, G. (1988) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1120-1171.
FERREL, O. C.; et al. (2001) Ética organizaçãorial: dilemas, tomadas de decisões e casos. Rio de Janeiro: Reichmann & Affonso.
FREEMAN, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
FREEMAN, C. (1987) Technology and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinters Publishers.
FROOMAN, J. (1999) Stakeholder influences strategies. Academy of Management Review, v. 24, n. 2, p. 191-205.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo, Atlas, 3. ed. 1991.
HALL, J.; VREDENBURG, H. (2003) The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. Sloan Management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 61-68.
HART, S. L.; MILSTEIN; M. B. (2004) Criando valor sustentável. RAE Executivo, v. 3, n. 2, p. 66–79.
HART, S. L.; CHRISTENSEN, C. M. (2002) The Great Leap: Driving Innovation from the Base of the Pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review.
HITT, M.; FREEMAN, E.; HARRISON, J. (2000) Handbook of strategic management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. p. 189-207.
HODCKINSON, C. (2001) The Epistemological Axiology of Evers and Lakomski: Some Un-Quineian Quibblings. In: EVERS, C. W.
KALER, J. (2003) Differentiating Stakeholder Theories. Journal of Business Ethics. Dordrecht, v. 46, n. 1, p. 71-87.
KEINERT, T. M. M. (2007) Organizações Sustentáveis: utopias e inovações. Belo Horizonte: Fapemig.
KIM, W. C.; MAUBORGNE, R. (2005) A estratégia do oceano azul: como criar novos mercados e tornar a concorrência irrelevante. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
KLINE; R. (1986) An Overview of Innovation, in LANDAU, R.; ROSENBERG, N. (orgs). The Positive Sum Strategy, Washington, DC: National Academy of Press.
LAKOMSKI, G. (1996) Exploring educational administration. Coherentist applications and criticaI debates. Oxford: Pergamon, p. 199-210.
LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M. A. (1986) Técnicas de pesquisa: planejamento e execução de pesquisas, amostragens e técnicas de pesquisa, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. São Paulo: Atlas.
LEA, D. (1999) Corporate and public reponsibility, stakeholder theory and the developing world. Business Ethics: A European Review, Malden, v. 8, n. 3, p. 151-162.
LYRA, M. G.; GOMES, R. C.; JACOVINE, L. A. G. (2009) O papel dos stakeholders na sustentabilidade da organização: contribuições para construção de um modelo de análise. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 13, n. spe, p. 39-52.
MENEGHETTI, F. K. (2011) What is a Theoretical Test. RAC, v. 15, n. 2, p. 320-332.
MILES, M. B.; HUBERMAN, A. M.; SALDAÑA, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods source book. California: Sage Publications.
MOON, S-G.; JEONG, S. Y.; CHOIi, Y. (2017) Moderating effects of trust on environmentally significant behaviour in Korea. Sustainability, v. 9, p. 415.
MUNHOZ, D. G. (1989) Economia aplicada: técnicas de pesquisa e análise econômica. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
NOBRE, F. S.; RIBEIRO, R. E. M. (2013) Cognição e sustentabilidade: estudo de casos múltiplos no índice de sustentabilidade empresarial da BM&F Bovespa. Rev. adm. contemp., v. 17, n. 4 , p. 499-517.
Organização para Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico – OCDE (2004). Manual de Oslo: proposta de diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Finep, 2004.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NACÕES UNIDAS. (2014) Programa das Nações Unidas para o Meio Ambiente. Gestão sustentável de resíduos de equipamentos eléctricos e eletrônicos na América Latina.
PAVITT, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical chance: Towards a toxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v. 13.
RIGBY, D. K. (2009) Ferramentas de gestão: um guia para executivos. São Paulo, Bain&Company.
RODRIGUES, I.; BARBIERI, J. C. (2008) A emergência da tecnologia social: revisitando o movimento da tecnologia apropriada como estratégia de desenvolvimento sustentável. Rev. Adm. Pública, v. 42, n. 6, p. 1069-1094.
ROBLES JR., A. (1994) Custos da Qualidade: uma estratégia para a competição global. São Paulo: Atlas.
SANTOS, P. M. F.; PORTO, R. B. (2013) A gestão ambiental como fonte de vantagem competitiva sustentável: contribuições da visão baseada em recursos e da teoria institucional. Revista de Ciências da Administração (CAD), v. 15, n. 35, p. 152-167.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, Inc..
SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1982) Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
SOUTHERTON, D.; WELCH, D. (2017) Focus: New Directions in Sustainable Consumption. Retrieved from Discover Society: http://discoversociety.org/2016/01/05/focus-new-directions-in- sustainableconsumption/
SRIVASTAVA, S. K. (2007) Green Supply Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Review Literature Review: International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 9, n. 1, p. 53-80.
TAPSCOTT, D.; TICOLL, D. (2005) A organização transparente. São Paulo: M. Books do Brasil.
TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J.; PAVITT, K. (2008) Gestão da Inovação. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
VERGARA, S. C. (2000) Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 3 .ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
ZILBER, S. N. et al. (2013) Investigação sobre a existência...mercado brasileiro de baixa renda. Produção, v. 23, n. 2, p. 283-296.