Analytical hierarchy process - bocr applied for the best lean project selection for production lines
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The scenario of global competitiveness demands more and more of the organizations the search for continuous improvement. For survival, in the face of adverse market conditions, modern production management strategies are essential to make production processes increasingly efficient, lean and sustainable, minimizing losses in their production systems. In this sense, when thinking about changes in production lines, in search of improvements in their process, criteria that provide Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (BOCR) should be considered. In this way, managers and executives should rely on tools and methods that allow them to guide their decisions in a clear way. The objective of this work is to apply a method of Decision Making with Multiple Criteria to the alternatives of investment projects in production lines in Lean Manufacturing concept. As a general result, it was possible to observe the applicability of the AHP BOCR method for the decision-making case involving several criteria and subcriteria for choosing the Lean investment project in the steel environment, the preferred alternative being the discontinuity of the production line 1 and the absorption of their respective production volume by production lines 2 and 3 through investments in them.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
CAMILO, H. F. et al. (2017) Assessment of photovoltaic distributed generation – Issues of grid connected systems through the consumer side applied to a case study of Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 71, n. December 2016, p. 712–719.
GHOBADIAN, A. et al. (2018) Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, n. July 2017, p. 1–12.
GNANAVELBABU, A.; ARUNAGIRI, P. (2018) Ranking of MUDA using AHP and Fuzzy AHP algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings, v. 5, n. 5, p. 13406–13412.
KHAN, M. I. (2018) Evaluating the strategies of compressed natural gas industry using an integrated SWOT and MCDM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 172, p. 1035–1052.
MEDEIROS, H. DA S.; SANTANA, A. F. B.; GUIMARÃES, L. DA S. (2017) O uso dos métodos de custeio nas indústrias de manufatura enxuta: uma análise da literatura. Gestão & Produção, v. 24, n. 2, p. 395–406.
MOSTAFA, S.; DUMRAK, J.; SOLTAN, H. (2015) Lean Maintenance Roadmap. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 2, n. February, p. 434–444.
MUFAZZAL, S.; MUZAKKIR, S. M. (2018) A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals. Computers and Industrial Engineering, v. 119, n. November 2017, p. 427–438.
PEREIRA, A. S. A.; BRANDALISE, N.; MELLO, L. C. B. DE B. (2017) Aplicação do método AHP na seleção de terrenos para edificações comerciais na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Sistemas & Gestão, v. 11, n. 4, p. 410.
SHAHSAVARI, M. H.; KHAMEHCHI, E. (2018) Optimum selection of sand control method using a combination of MCDM and DOE techniques. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 171, n. January, p. 229–241.
SILVA, A. C. S.; NASCIMENTO, L. P. A. DA S.; BELDERRAIN, M. C. N. (2010) Aplicação do método analytic network process (ANP) com abordagem BOCR no contexto militar. Simpósio De Pesquisa Operacional E Logística Da Marinha, p. 11.
SUÁREZ-BARRAZA, M. F. et al. (2016) In search of “Muda” through the TKJ diagram. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 8, n. 3, p. 377–394.
WIJNMALEN, D. J. D. (2007) Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, v. 46, n. 7–8, p. 892–905.
YADAV, G.; SETH, D.; DESAI, T. N. Prioritising solutions for Lean Six Sigma adoption barriers through fuzzy AHP-modified TOPSIS framework. [s.l: s.n.]. v. 9