Main variables that are influenced by the anthropic activity resulting from the soybean production in the municipalities of Mato Grosso

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML XML
Published: Jul 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v9i5.812
Keywords:
Anthropic Activity of Soybean Multivariate Statistical Analysis Environmental Social Economic Factors

Main Article Content

Rodrigo Carlo Toloi
Universidade Paulista - UNIP IFMT Campus Rondonópolis
Alexandra Cristina Ramos da Silva Lopes
Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto (FEUP)
Marley Nunes Vituri Toloi
IFMT Campus Rondonópolis
João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis
Universidade Paulista (UNIP)
Silvia Helena Bonilla
Universidade Paulista (UNIP)
Moacir de Freitas Junior
FATEC Suzano, Universidade Paulista (UNIP)
صندلی اداری

Abstract

This study aimed to identify how the main variables that are influenced by the anthropic activity resulting from the soybean production in the Mato Grosso Municipalities cluster among themselves. Factor analysis method was used to identify underlying dimensions that can account for the shared variation of observed variables. The factorial analysis proposes to reduce the number of variables by the extraction of independent factors, so that a better explanation of the relationship between the original variables occurs, avoiding correlational problems and reducing the relevance of endogeneity. Three dimensions were identified, each with a different combination of variables. Based on the results from principal components modelling it is fair to state that the impacts of the anthropic activity resulting from soybean production in the Mato Grosso municipalities can be analyzed according to three main domains: production impacts, socioeconomic impacts and demographic impacts. The main contribution of this paper is that it offers a useful framework of analysis for both public and private decision-makers regarding the influence of soybean production on economic, social, environmental, and cultural factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 5 (2018): Independent Journal of Management & Production (Special Edition)
Section
IFLOG

1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).

 

Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

 

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

 

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

 

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).


d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
     Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
           Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
           Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
                  The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
                  The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
           At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
      Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.

Author Biography

Rodrigo Carlo Toloi, Universidade Paulista - UNIP IFMT Campus Rondonópolis

Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia de Produção da Universidade Paulista - UNIP

Departamento de Ensino do IFMT Campus Rondonópolis

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

ABIOVE, (N/I) Importância Econômica e Social da Cadeia Produtiva de Oleaginosa. Avaliable: http://www.abiove.org.br/site/index.php?page=importancia-economica-e-social&area=NC0yLTI. Access: 7 out. 2017.

ANHOLETO, C. D.; MASSUQUETTI, A. (2014) A Soja Brasileira e Gaúcha no Período 1994-2010: Uma Análise da Produção, Exportação, Renda e Emprego. Revista Economia e Desenvolvimento, v. 13, n. 2, p. 379–404.

ARVOR, D. et al. (2010) A evolução do setor soja no Mato Grosso. Revista Franco-Brasileira de Geografia, n. 10.

BERNARDI, A. C. C.; NAIME, J. M.; RESENDE, Á. V.; BASSOI, L. H.; INAMASU, R. Y. (2014) Agricultura de precisão: resultados de um novo olhar. Brasília: EMBRAPA.

BINI, F. C. (2016) Análise da Performance Ambiental e a Capacitação Profissional Rural na Produção de Soja e Milho no Estado de Mato Grosso. Dissertação—Bauru: Universidade Estadual Paulista.

CAVALETT, O.; ORTEGA, E. (2009) Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 17, n. 8, p. 762–771.

CHIOVETO, M. O. T. (2014) Desenvolvimento Rural no Mato Grosso e seus Biomas. Tese—Toledo: Universidade do Oeste do Paraná.

CONAB, C. N. A. (2017) Séries Históricas de Área Plantada, Produtividade e Produção, Relativas às Safras 1976/77 a 2015/16 de Grãos. Avaliable: http://www.conab.gov.br/conteudos.php?a=1252&t=2&Pagina_objcmsconteudos=3#A_objcmsconteudos. Access: 26 abr. 2017

FAGUNDES, M. B. B.; SIQUEIRA, R. P. (2013) Caracterização do Sistema Agroindustrial da Soja em Mato Grosso do Sul. Revista de Política Agrícola, v. 22, n. 3, p. 58–72.

FAS/USDA. (2016) World Agricultural Production: Circular Series July 2016. Washington: USDA -United States Department of Agriculture, 16 jul. 2016. Avaliable: http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf. Access: 21 jul. 2016.

FIELD, A. (2009) Descobrindo a Estatística usando o SPSS. Traducao Lorí Viali. 2a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

GIBBS,H. K.; RAUSCH, L.; MUNGER, J.; SCHELLY, I.; MORTON, D. C.; NOOJIPADY, P.; SOARES FILHO, B.; BARRETO, P.; MICOL, L. WALKER, N. F. (2015) Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science, v. 347, n. 6220, p. 377–378.

HAIR, J. F. (ED) (2006) Multivariate data analysis. 6th. ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.

HIRAKURI, M. H.; CASTRO, C.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; DEBIASI, H.; PROCÓPIO, S. de O.; BALBINOT JUNIOR, A. A. (2014) Indicadores de Sustentabilidade da Cadeia Produtiva da Soja no Brasil. Londrina: Embrapa Soja.

KUMAGAI, E.; SAMESHIMA, R. (2014) Genotypic Differences in Soybean Yield Responses toIncreasing Temperature in a Cool Climate are Related to Maturity Group. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, v. 198–199, p. 265–272.

LINDOSO, D. (2009) Pegada Climática do Uso da Terra: Um diagnóstico do dilema entre o modelo de desenvolvimento agropecuário mato-grossense e as mudanças climáticas no período de 2001-2007. Dissertação—Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.

LOPES, H. S.; FERREIRA, R. C.; LIMA, R. S. (2015) Logísitica da Soja Brasileira para Exportação: Modelo de Otimização de Custos Logísticos. XXIX Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes. Anais... In: XXIX ANPET. Ouro Preto: Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes - ANPET.

LUEDEMANN, M. S. (2009) O Desenvolvimento do Agronegócio no Brasil Central: Um Estudo sobre Mato Grosso. XII Encuentro de Geógrafos de América Latina, 2009. Anais... In: XII EGAL CAMINANDO EN UNA AMÉRICA LATINA EM TRANSFORMACIÓN. Montevidéu: Easy Planner.

MDIC, S. A. Sistema de análise das informações de comércio exterior via internet do Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior. Avaliable: http://aliceweb.mdic.gov.br//consulta-ncm/consultar. Access: 1 abr. 2016.

PAULA, S. R. DE; FAVERET FILHO, P. (1998) Panorama do Complexo Soja. BNDES Setorial, v. 8, p. 119–152.

SILVA, V. P.; et al. (2010) Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 91, n. 9, p. 1831–1839.

RAUCCI, G. S.; et al. (2015) Greenhouse gas assessment of Brazilian soybean production: a case study of Mato Grosso State. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, p. 418–425.

RODRIGUES, W. (2005) Valoração econômica dos impactos ambientais de tecnologias de plantio em região de Cerrados. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 43, n. 1, p. 135–153.

SÁ, A. J.; ALBANO, G. P. (2011) Globalização da Agricultura: Multinacionais no Campo Brasileiro. Revista de Geografia (UFPE), v. 28, n. 1, p. 54–80.

SOARES, A. F. (2016) Requisitos Ambientais no Mercado de Soja Brasileiro: Descrição e Avaliação de Impacto. Dissertação—Piracicaba: USP/ Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz.

SOUZA, N. J. (2005) Desenvolvimento Econômico. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

STEVENS, J. (2009) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 5th ed ed. New York: Routledge.

TEIXEIRA, M. D. J.; FARIA, A. M. M.; ZAVALA, A. A. (2013) Emissões Antrópicas de Gases de Efeito Estufa (GEE) e Referenciais para Política de Mitigação das Emissões em Mato Grosso (Brasil). Revista Eletrônica Documento Monumento - REDM, v. 10, n. 1, p. 307–323.

VITURI, M. N. (2010) Um Estudo Baseado Nos Indicadores do Setor Agropecuário e o Desenvolvimento Socioeconômico nos Municípios do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Dissertação—Campo Grande: Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul.

WWF, W. W. F. (2014) The growth of Soy: Impacts and Solutions. [s.l: s.n.]. Disponível em: http://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/?38423/A-expanso-da-soja. Access: 28 jul. 2017.

ZHU, Q.; SARKIS, J. (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, v. 22, n. 3, p. 265–289.

فروشگاه اینترنتی