A complex systems approach to e-governance adoption and implementation in Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
Globally, public sector innovation has become a big issue as citizens demand for greater accountability, effectiveness and efficiency in service delivery, and the liberalisation of the governance system. Debate on e-government evolved in the last decade in parallel with a broader discussion on e-governance, where the concept and practice of e-governance further encompasses the e-government phenomenon. Because of the complexities of governance and e-governance, this chapter presents e-governance as a close, large integrated, open and sociotechnical (CLIOS) framework to meet present and emerging challenges of the e-world, as well as enhance good governance for sustainability. Novel descriptions of e-governance, governance, CLIOS, complex adaptive systems, sociotechnical systems were provided from literature. From a socio-technical perspective, the design consideration for the adoption and implementation of e-governance architecture for a State in an emerging economy like Nigeria was provided. The contextual aspects that needed to be considered for the adoption of e-governance were discussed and citizens interface with governance through e-governance platforms were highlighted. Examples of countries implementing e-governance, benefits and challenges regarding the Bayelsa case were discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AL ATHMAY, A. A. R. A. (2012) Assessing the implementation of e-governance in Arab Counties. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, v. 5, n. 1, p. 20-40.
AL ATHMAY, A. A. R. A. (2013) E-governance in Arab countries: status and challenges. Global Journal of Business Research, v. 7, n.5, p. 79-98.
ALHARBI, N. (2013) E-government security modelling: Explaining main factors and analysing existing models. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering, v. 7, n. 9, p. 674-676.
AL-SHAFI, S.; WEERAKKODY, V. (2010) Adoption and diffusion of free wireless internet parks in Qatar. International Journal of Value Chain Management, v. 4, n. 1/2, p. 68-85.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; MICHIE, J. (1997) Technological globalization or national systems of innovation? Futures, v. 29, n. 2, p. 121-137.
AWAN, O.; AMIN, M.; KIRKBY, K. (2013) Introduction to e-governance. In: MING, A.; SOMANI, N.; AWAN, O. (Eds.) e-Governance in Small States. London: The Commonwealth, p. 1-24.
BERNHARD, I. (2013) E-government and e-governance – Swedish case studies with focus on the local level. Thesis (PhD in Urban and Regional Planning) Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:663249/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed, 24/06/2017.
BIBIKAS, D.; KOURTESIS, D.; PARASKAKIS, I.; BERNARDI, A.; SAUERMANN, L.; APOSTOLOU, D.; MENTZAS, G.; VASONCELOS, A. C. (2008) A sociotechnical approach to knowledge management in the era of enterprise 2.0: the case of Organik. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, v. 9, n. 4, p. 315-327.
BLAIR, D.; NIETO-GOMEZ, R.; SITTERLE, V. (2013) Technology, Society, and the Adaptive Nature of Terrorism: Implications for Counterterror. In: CABAYAN, H.; SITTERLE, V.; YANDURA, M. (Eds.) Looking Back, Looking Forward: Perspectives on Terrorism and Responses to It. Strategic Multi-layer Assessment1 Occasional White Paper, September 2013, p. 31-43.
BUBOU, G. M.; EJIM-EZE, E. E.; OKRIGWE, F. N. (2012) The telecoms sectoral system of innovation and the diffusion of mobile telephony in Nigeria. In: Portland INTERNATONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGE. P. 1608-1616, Proceedings, Vancouver.
CHOWDHURY, M. M. H.; SATTER, A. K. M. (2013) Citizen perspective e-governance model for developing countries: Bangladesh context. American Journal of Modelling and Optimization, v. 1, n. 3, p. 43-46.
CURTIN, G. G. (2007) E-Government. In: The Encyclopaedia of Political Communications. Sage Publications.
DAVIDRAJUH, R. (2004) Planning e-government start-up: A case study on e-Sri Lanka. Electronic Government, an International Journal, v. 1, n. 1, p. 92-06.
DOSKEY, S.; MAZZUCHI, T.; SARKANI, S. (2013) Exploring systems engineering patterns in government acquisition of complex information systems. Information Knowledge Systems Management, v. 12, p. 97-114.
GANT, J. P. (2008) Electronic Government for Developing Countries. ITU, Geneva.
GEBBA, T. R.; ZAKARIA, M. R. (2012) E-government in Egypt: An analysis of practices and challenges. International Journal of Technology and Management, v. 1, n. 1, p. 11-25.
GUPTA, D. N. (2004) Six sigma for quality in e-governance – A framework. Paper presented at the 2nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNANCE, Colombo.
HILLMAN, K. M.; NILSSON, M.; RICKNE, A.; MAGNUSSON, T. (2011) Fostering sustainable technologies - a framework for analyzing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, v. 38, n. 5, p. 403-415.
HOLLAND, J. H. (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
HUANG, H.; YEO, B.; TRAUT, E. M. (2006) Exploring the situated context of knowledge management in e-government development. International Journal of Advanced Media and Communication, v. 1, n. 2, p. 148-159.
KAYE, J. (2011) From single biobanks to international networks: Developing e-governance. Human Genetics, v. 130, p. 377-382.
KORUKONDA, A. R. (2012) Information technology and market efficiency. In International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Communication and Information Technologies, v. 1, p. 144-148.
KUMAR, T. S. (2011) Sharon - agent based service middleware for e-governance: A systematic web examination based approach using Christina ontology. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, v. 4, n. 13, p. 396-400.
LARACY, J. R. (2007) Addressing system boundary issues in complex socio-technical systems. Systems Research Forum, v. 2, n. 1, p. 19-26.
MAIO, P. D. (2014) Towards a metamodel to support the joint optimization of socio technical systems. Systems, v. 2, p. 273-296.
MARINOVA, D. (2009) Global green system of innovation: Technological wave or policy? Paper presented at the 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia.
MISURACA, G. C. (2007) E-Governance in Africa, from Theory to Action: A Handbook on ICTs for Local Governance. Ottawa, Cairo, Montevideo, Nairobi, New Delhi, Singapore: Africa World Press, Inc./International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
MISURACA, G. C. (2012) E-governance: Past, present and future: A theoretical framework for prospective policy analysis. In M. Finger & F. N. Sultana (Eds.) E-Governance, A Global Journey. Clifton, VA, Amsterdam, Tokyo: IOS Press, p. 185-199.
NKWE, N. (2012) E-government: Challenges and opportunities in Botswana. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 39-48.
OECD. (2003) The e-Government Imperative. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010) Denmark: Efficient e-Government for Smarter Public Service Delivery. Paris: OECD Publishing.
PHISTER, P. W. (2011) Cyberspace: The ultimate complex adaptive system. The International C2 Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 2010-2011.
PORTER, W. (2013) ‘Rethinking Counterterrorism: The Need for Systemic Strategic Planning and a Strategic Campaign to Address Violent Islamist Extremism that Manifests Itself in Terrorist Acts. In H. Cabayan, V. Sitterle, V. and Yandura, M. (Eds.) Looking Back, Looking Forward: Perspectives on Terrorism and Responses to It. Strategic Multi-layer Assessment1 Occasional White Paper, September 2013, p. 11-20.
ROBACK, K. (2006) Medical device innovation: The integrated processes of invention, diffusion and deployment. Dissertations (PhD in Health and Society), University of Linkoping, Sweden.
SAHU, G. P.; GUPTA, M. P.; SAHOO, T. (2004) Towards a model of e-governance acceptance. Paper presented at the 2nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNANCE, Colombo, 2004.
SEKER, S. E. (2004) Possible social impacts of e-government: A case study of Turkey. Dissertations (MA in Social Sciences) Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
SHAHWAN, U. (2010) E-governance in developing countries. Available at: http://css.escwa.org.ib/ictd/01018/presentation/day2/8pdf. Accessed 03/01/2011.
STERMAN, J. D. (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, v. 18, n. 4, p. 501-531.
SUURS, R. A. A. (2009) Motors of sustainable innovation - towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Dissertation (PhD in ), University of Utrecht, Nederland.
VISSER, W.; TWINOMURINZI H. (2008) E-Government and public service delivery: Enabling ICT to put “people first” – a case study from South Africa. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, v. 6, n. 6, p. 36-41.
WILLIAMS, M. D. (2014) Young world rising - how youth, technology and entrepreneurship are changing the world from the bottom up. A book review: The Journal of Community Informatics, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-2.