Towards an investigation on the determinants for effectiveness and efficiency of reverse logistics systems (RLS)
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This article deals with the influence of economies of scale and postponement on the efficiency and effectiveness of reverse logistics systems (RLSs). In a global way, it aims to provide an understanding of RLSs to generate knowledge of practical and theoretical character. Starting from a generic model of circular flow of materials, the system studied is positioned between the final consumer and the traditional or direct supply chain. It is a qualitative approach over two case studies carried out in Portugal and Brazil dealing with scraptires. One deals with management system while the other deals with the reverse logistics system. As conclusions, the efficiency of RLSs is aided by economies of scale. Postponement has positive effects on efficiency by increasing the system capacity reducing logistics costs which indirectly leads to economies of scale, having a positive influence on the effectiveness of RLSs. According to what has been stated in this paper, the coordination between the direct and reverse flow is a typical case of a closed circuit.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
ALDERSON, W. (1950) Marketing efficiency and the principle of postponement. Cost and Profit Outlook, v. 3, p. 15–18.
BOONE, C. A.; CRAIGHEAD, C. W.; HANNA, J. B. (2007) Postponement: an evolving supply chain concept. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, v. 37, n. 8, p. 594–611
DE BRITO, M. (2004) Managing Reverse Logistics or Reversing Logistics Management? PhD Thesis, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Netherlands.
DEKKER, R.; PORRAS, E. (2005) Controlling Inventories in a Supply Chain: a Case Study. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 94, p. 179-188.
FEITZINGER, E.; LEE, H. L. (1997) Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: the power of postponement. Harvard Business Review, v. 75, p. 116-121.
FERGUSON, M.; FLEISCHMANN, M.; DE SOUZA, G. (2010) Applying Revenue Management to Reverse Supply Chain. Technical Repport, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
FREIRES, F. G.; GUEDES, A. P. S. (2008) Power And Trust in Reverse Logistics Systems for Scraptires and its Impact on Performance. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, v. 1, n. 1, p. 57-65.
GALBRETH, M.; BLACKBURN, J. D. (2010) Offshore remanufacturing with variable usable product condition, Decision Sciences, v. 41, n. 1, p. 5-20.
GEYER, R.; VAN WASSENHOV, L.; ATASU, A. (2007) The economics of remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles. Management Science, v. 53, n. 1, p. 88-100.
GUIDE Jr., D.; VAN WASSENHOVE, L. N. (2006) Closed- loop supply chains. Special Issue, Production & Operational Management, v. 15, n. 3-4.
GUIDE Jr., D.; VAN WASSENHOVE, L. N. (2009) The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, v. 57, n. 1, p. 10-18.
HARRINGTON, J. (1993) Business Process Improvement: The Breaktrhough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York (2nd edition).
JAHRE, M. (1995a) Logistics Systems for Recycling- Efficient Collection of Household Waste. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Logistics and Transportation, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
JAHRE, M. (1995b) Household waste collection as Reverse Channels – a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 39-55.
JAHRE, M.; VIRUM, H. (1993) Comparing systems for collection, reuse and recycling in the case of electronics, The First International Working Seminar on Reuse, Eindhoven (Netherlands).
MERRIAM, S. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (3rd edition).
NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M.; PLATTS, K. (1995) Performance Measurement System Design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 15, n. 4, p. 80-96.
PAGH, J.; COOPER, M. (1998) Supply Chain Postponement and Speculation Strategies: How to Choose the Right Strategy. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 19, n. 2, p. 13-33.
STEFAN HOLMBERG, (2000) A systems perspective on supply chain measurements, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, v. 30, n. 10, p. 847 - 868
STOCK, J. R. (1998) Development and Implementation of Reverse Logistics Programs. Oak Brook: Council of Logistics Management.
STRAUSS, A.; CORBIN, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, San Francisco (2nd edition).
VAN HOEK, R. (1999) From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management, v. 4, n. 3, p. 129-134.
VAN HOEK, R. (2001) The rediscovery of postponement: a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management, v.19, p. 161-184.
VAN HOEK, R.; COMMANDEUR, H.; VOS, B. (1998) Reconfiguring Logistics Systems Through Postponement Strategies. International Journal of Business Logistics, v.19, n. 1, p. 33-54.
YANG, B.; YANG, Y.; WIJNGAARD, J. (2007) Postponement: an inter-organizational perspective. International Journal of Production Research, v.45, n. 4, p. 971-988.
YIN, R. (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, London (4th edition).
ZINN, W.; BOWERBOX, D. (1988) Planning Physical Distribution with the Principle of Postponement. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 9, n. 2, p. 117-136.