Joint lot sizing and scheduling of a multi-product multi-period supply chain

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Oct 1, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v10i5.959
Keywords:
Joint Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Supply Chain optimization Integrated Supply Chain

Main Article Content

Ahmed Othman El-meehy
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University
Amin K. El-Kharbotly
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University
Mohammed M. El-Beheiry
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University
صندلی اداری

Abstract

The joint lot sizing and scheduling problem can be considered as an evolvement of the joint economic lot size problem which has drawn researchers’ interests for decades. The objective of this paper is to find the effect of a capacitated multi-period supply chain design parameters on joint lot sizing and scheduling decisions for different holding and penalty costs. The supply chain deals with two raw materials suppliers. The production facility produces two products which are shipped to customers through distribution centers. A mathematical model is developed to determine optimum quantities of purchased raw materials, production schedule (MPS), delivered quantities and raw material and products inventory for predetermined number of periods. The model is solved to maximize total supply chain profits. Results showed that at high capacity and low holding cost, the supply chain tends to produce only one product each period, for limited capacity and high value of holding cost, the supply chain may produce the two products together each period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 10 No. 5 (2019): Independent Journal of Management & Production
Section
Articles

1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).

 

Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

 

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

 

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

 

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).


d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
     Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
           Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
           Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
                  The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
                  The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
           At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
      Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.

Author Biographies

Ahmed Othman El-meehy, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University

Ahmed El-Meehy is a master’s degree candidate at the Design and Production Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. He received his bachelor degree in 2013 from Ain Shams University.

Amin K. El-Kharbotly, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University

Amin El-Kharbotly is a Professor at the Design and Production Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt since 1993. He has received his Ph.D. in 1977 from Ain Shams University.

Mohammed M. El-Beheiry, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University

Mohamed M. El-Beheiry is an assistant professor the Department of Design and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. He has a degree in Mechanical Engineering (1994) and an MSc in Production Planning and Scheduling (1999) from the Ain Shams University. He also has a PhD degree in Supply Chain Management (2004). His research areas include production scheduling, inventory control, supply chain dynamics, and simulation.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

BEN-DAYA, M.; DARWISH, M.; ERTOGRAL, K. (2008) The joint economic lot sizing problem: Review and extensions, European Journal of Operational Research, v. 185, n. 2, p. 726–742. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.026.

CUNHA, A. L. et al. (2018) An integrated approach for production lot sizing and raw material purchasing, European Journal of Operational Research. Elsevier B.V., v. 269, n. 3, p. 923–938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.042.

ERTOGRAL, K.; DARWISH, M.; BEN-DAYA, M. (2007) Production and shipment lot sizing in a vendor-buyer supply chain with transportation cost, European Journal of Operational Research, v. 176, n. 3, p. 1592–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.036.

GHARAEI, A.; JOLAI, F. (2018) A multi-agent approach to the integrated production scheduling and distribution problem in multi-factory supply chain, Applied Soft Computing Journal. Elsevier B.V., n. 65, p. 577–589. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.002.

GLOCK, C. H. (2012) The joint economic lot size problem: A review, International Journal of Production Economics. Elsevier, v. 135, n. 2, p. 671–686. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.026.

HARIGA, M. et al. (2013) Scheduling and lot sizing models for the single-vendor multi-buyer problem under consignment stock partnership, Journal of the Operational Research Society. Nature Publishing Group, v. 64, n. 7, p. 995–1009. doi: 10.1057/jors.2012.101.

HUANG, J. Y.; YAO, M. J. (2013) On the optimal lot-sizing and scheduling problem in serial-type supply chain system using a time-varying lot-sizing policy, International Journal of Production Research, v. 51, n. 3, p. 735–750. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.662604.

JIA, T. et al. (2016) Optimal production-delivery policy for a vendor-buyers integrated system considering postponed simultaneous delivery, Computers and Industrial Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, n. 99, p. 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.002.

LEE, S. D.; FU, Y. C. (2014) Joint production and delivery lot sizing for a make-to-order producer-buyer supply chain with transportation cos’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Elsevier Ltd, n. 66, p. 23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.03.002.

MARCHI, B. et al. (2016) A joint economic lot size model with financial collaboration and uncertain investment opportunity, International Journal of Production Economics. Elsevier, n. 176, p. 170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.021.

MUNGAN, D.; YU, J.; SARKER, B. R. (2010) Manufacturing lot-sizing, procurement and delivery schedules over a finite planning horizon, International Journal of Production Research, v. 48, n. 12, p. 3619–3636. doi: 10.1080/00207540902878228.

POURAKBAR, M.; FARAHANI, R. Z.; ASGARI, N. (2007) A joint economic lot-size model for an integrated supply network using genetic algorithm, Applied Mathematics and Computation, v. 189, n. 1, p. 583–596. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.116.

SADJADI, S. J.; ZOKAEE, S.; DABIRI, N. (2014) A single-vendor single-buyer joint economic lot size model subject to budget constraints, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 70, n. 9–12, p. 1699–1707. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5382-2.

SAĞLAM, Ü.; BANERJEE, A. (2018) Integrated multiproduct batch production and truck shipment scheduling under different shipping policies, Omega (United Kingdom), n. 74, p. 70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.007.

SARIN, S. C.; SHERALI, H. D.; LIAO, L. (2014) Primary pharmaceutical manufacturing scheduling problem, IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), v. 46, n. 12, p. 1298–1314. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2014.882529.

SAWIK, T. (2016) Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks, Omega (United Kingdom). Elsevier, n. 62, p. 131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.09.005.

SENOUSSI, A. et al. (2016) Modeling and solving a one-supplier multi-vehicle production-inventory-distribution problem with clustered retailers, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 85, n. 5–8, p. 971–989. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7966-5.

TORABI, S. A.; FATEMI GHOMI, S. M. T.; KARIMI, B. (2006) A hybrid genetic algorithm for the finite horizon economic lot and delivery scheduling in supply chains, European Journal of Operational Research, v. 173, n. 1, p. 173–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.11.012.

VAN HOESEL, S. et al. (2005) Integrated Lot Sizing in Serial Supply Chains with Production Capacities, Management Science, v. 51, n. 11, p. 1706–1719. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0378.

WANG, S. P.; LEE, W. (2013) A joint economic lot-sizing model for the hospital’s supplier with capacitated warehouse constraint, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, v. 30, n. 3, p. 202–210. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2013.805700.

ZHAO, S. T.; WU, K.; YUAN, X. M. (2016) Optimal production-inventory policy for an integrated multi-stage supply chain with time-varying demand, European Journal of Operational Research. Elsevier B.V., v. 255, n. 2, p. 364–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.027.

فروشگاه اینترنتی