Insertion of sustainability concepts in the maintenance strategies to achieve sustainable manufacturing
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Companies adopt sustainable practices in order to improve the economic, environmental and social performance of their operations. This fact does not occur with the same intensity in maintenance operations. By adopting sustainable practices during the implementation of maintenance strategies, there will be mitigation of industrial maintenance impacts on sustainability. However, there are few studies on the integration of sustainability in maintenance activities and few companies adopt sustainable maintenance due to lack of knowledge of the subject and its benefits. This paper aims to show how the concepts of sustainability are being inserted in the maintenance strategies. For this purpose, a literature review and a systematic literature review were performed. It was verified that the concepts of sustainability are integrated into maintenance strategies by means of sustainable criteria, with emphasis on lost production cost, spare parts cost and expenditures associated with energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (economic dimension), on pollutant emission due to energy consumption during machining/manufacturing (environmental dimension) and on health and safety at work (social dimension). This paper contributes to the dissemination of the theme and motivates the companies to implement sustainable maintenance.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AL-NAJJAR, B.; ASYOUF, I. (2003) Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 84, n. 1, p. 85-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8.
AMRINA, E.; ARIDHARMA, D. (2016) Sustainable maintenance performance evaluation model for cement industry. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), p. 350-354. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797895.
ASHLEY, P. A. (2005) Ética e responsabilidade social nos negócios. São Paulo: Saraiva.
BEHZAD, M.; KIM, H.; BEHZAD, M.; BEHAMBARI, H. A. (2019) Improving sustainability performance of heating facilities in a central boiler room by condition-based maintenance. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 206, p. 713-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.221.
BRUNDTLAND, G. H. (1987) Our common future—Call for action. Environmental Conservation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 291-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805.
CHITRA, T. (2003) Life based maintenance policy for minimum cost. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (IEEE), p. 470-474. DOI: 10.1109/RAMS.2003.1182034.
DIMITROFF-REGATSCHNIG, H.; SCHNITZER, H. (1998) A techno–economic approach to link waste minimization technologies with the reduction of corporate environmental costs: effects on the resource and energy efficiency of production. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 6, n. 3-4, p. 213-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00004-3.
DO, P.; HOANG, A.; IUNG, B.; VU, H. C. (2018) Energy efficiency for condition-based maintenance decision-making: Application to a manufacturing platform. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, v. 232, n. 4, p. 379-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X18762282.
ELKINGTON, J. (1998) Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, v. 2, n. 3, p. 18-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539.
FRANCIOSI, C.; LAMBIASE, A.; MIRANDA, S. (2017) Sustainable Maintenance: A Periodic Preventive Maintenance Model with Sustainable Spare Parts Management. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 50, n. 1, p. 13692-13697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2536.
GANDHARE, B. S.; AKARTE, M. (2012) Maintenance strategy selection. Ninth AIMS International Conference on Management, p. 1330-1336.
GRALL, A.; DIEULLE, L.; BÉRENGUER, C.; ROUSSIGNOL, M. (2002) Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, v. 51, n. 2, p. 141-150. DOI: 10.1109/TR.2002.1011518.
GUDMUNDSSON, H.; HALL, R. P.; MARSDEN, G.; ZIETSMAN, J. (2015) Sustainable transportation: Indicators, frameworks, and performance management. Springer.
GUTHRIE, J.; PETTY, R.; YONGVANICH, K.; RICCERI, F. (2004) Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, v. 5, n. 2, p. 282-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410533704.
GUTOWSKI, T.; MURPHY, C.; ALLEN, D.; BAUER, D.; BRAS, B.; PIWONKA, T.; SHENG, P.; SUTHERLAND, J.; THURSTON, D.; WOLFF, E. (2005) Environmentally benign manufacturing: observations from Japan, Europe and the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.004.
HENNEQUIN, S.; RESTREPO, L. M. R. (2016) Fuzzy model of a joint maintenance and production control under sustainability constraints. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 49, n. 12, p. 1216-1221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.676.
HOANG, A.; DO, P.; IUNG, B. (2016) Investigation on the use of energy efficiency for condition-based maintenance decision-making. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 49, n. 28, p. 73-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.013.
IGHRAVWE, D. E.; IGHRAVWE, D. E.; AYOOLA OKE, S.; AYOOLA OKE, S. (2017) Ranking maintenance strategies for sustainable maintenance plan in manufacturing systems using fuzzy axiomatic design principle and fuzzy-TOPSIS. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 28, n. 7, p. 961-992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2017-0007.
IUNG, B.; LEVRAT, E. (2014) Advanced maintenance services for promoting sustainability. Procedia CIRP, v. 22, p. 15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.018.
JAMALI, D. (2006) Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal, v. 12, n. 6, p. 809-821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710945.
JASIULEWICZ-KACZMAREK, M. (2013a) The role and contribution of maintenance in sustainable manufacturing. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, v. 46, n. 9, p. 1146-1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00511.
JASIULEWICZ-KACZMAREK, M.; BAPTISTA, J. S.; BARROSO, M.; CARNEIRO, P.; LAMB, P.; COSTA, N.; PERESTRELO, G. (2013b) The role of ergonomics in implementation of the social aspect of sustainability, illustrated with the example of maintenance. Occupational Safety and Hygiene, p. 47-52.
JASIULEWICZ-KACZMAREK, M. (2014) Integrating lean and green paradigms in maintenance management. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, v. 47, n. 3, p. 4471-4476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02213.
JASIULEWICZ-KACZMAREK, M. (2015) Practical aspects of the application of RCM to select optimal maintenance policy of the production line. Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications-Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), p. 1187-1195.
JAYAL, A. D.; BADURDEEN, F.; DILLON, O. W.; JAWAHIR, I. S. (2010) Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006.
JIANG, A.; DONG, N.; TAM, K. L.; LYU, C. (2018) Development and Optimization of a Condition-Based Maintenance Policy with Sustainability Requirements for Production System. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4187575.
KELLY, A. (1997) Maintenance strategy business-centred maintenance. Elseveir and Butterworth Heinemann, New York, NY.
KHAN, F. I.; HADDARA, M. M. (2003) Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 16, n. 6, p. 561-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2003.08.011.
KUMAR, A.; SHANKAR, R.; THAKUR, L. S. (2018) A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction. Journal of Computational Science, v. 27, p. 428-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.06.006
LEVY, Y.; ELLIS, T. J. (2006) A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science, v. 9, p. 181-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/479.
MACCHI, M.; FARRUKU, K.; HOLGADO, M.; NEGRI, E.; PANARESE, D. (2016) Economic and environmental impact assessment through system dynamics of technology-enhanced maintenance services. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, v. 23, n. 1, p. 36-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2016.075806.
MARQUEZ, A. C.; GUPTA, J. N. (2006) Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars. Omega, v. 34, n. 3, p. 313-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.003.
MOUBRAY, J. (2000) The case against streamlined RCM. Aladon, UK.
NAMBIAR, A. N. (2010) Challenges in sustainable manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Dhaka, Bangladesh, p. 1-6.
NEZAMI, F. G.; YILDIRIM, M. B. (2011) A framework for a fuzzy sustainable maintenance strategy selection problem. Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), p. 1-1. DOI: 10.1109/ISSST.2011.5936857.
NEZAMI, F. G.; YILDIRIM, M. B. (2013) A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 332-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2013.765928.
O'CONNOR, M.; SPASH, C. (1999) Valuation and the Environment: Theory, Method and Practice. Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar.
PARKIN, S. (2000) Sustainable development: the concept and the practical challenge. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering, Thomas Telford Ltd., vol. 138, n. 6, p. 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.2000.138.6.3.
PIECHOWSKI, M.; SZAFER, P.; WYCZOLKOWSKI, R.; GLADYSIAK, V. (2018) Concept of the FMEA method-based model supporting proactive and preventive maintenance activities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, p. 1-13.
PINJALA, K.S. (2008) Dynamics of Maintenance Strategy. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Belgium. Doctoral Report.
PIRES, S. P.; SÉNÉCHAL, O; DESCHAMPS, F.; LOURES, E.F.R.; PERRONI, M.G. (2015) Industrial maintenance for sustainable performance: a systematic literature review. International Conference on Production Research, p. 1-14.
PUSAVEC, F.; KRAJNIK, P.; KOPAC, J. (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production–Part I: application on machining technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 2, p. 174-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.010.
RADHOUI, M.; TLILI, L.; CHELBI, A.; REZG, N. (2012) Preventive maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to random environmental damage generation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, v. 45, n. 31, p. 109-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20121122-2-ES-4026.00026.
SANIUK, A.; JASIULEWICZ-KACZMAREK, M.; SAMOLEJOVÁ, A.; SANIUK, S.; LENORT, R. (2015) Environmental favourable foundries through maintenance activities. Metalurgija, v. 54, n. 4, p. 725-728.
SARI, E.; SHAHAROUN, A. M.; MA’ARAM, A.; YAZID, A. M. (2015) Sustainable maintenance performance measures: a pilot survey in Malaysian automotive companies. Procedia CIRP, v. 26, p. 443-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.163.
SAVINO, M. M.; MACCHI, M.; MAZZA, A. (2015) Investigating the impact of social sustainability within maintenance operations: An action research in heavy industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 21, n. 3, p. 310-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-06-2014-0038.
SÉNÉCHAL, O. (2017) Research directions for integrating the triple bottom line in maintenance dashboards. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 331-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.132.
SÉNÉCHAL, O. (2018) Performance indicators nomenclatures for decision making in sustainable conditions based maintenance. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 51, n. 11, p. 1137-1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.438.
SHARMA, R. K.; KUMAR, D.; KUMAR, P. (2005) FLM to select suitable maintenance strategy in process industries using MISO model. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 11, n. 4, p. 359-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510510626981.
WANG, L.; CHU, J.; WU, J. (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 107, n. 1, p. 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005.
WILLMOTT, P.; MCCARTHY, D. (2000) TPM-A Route to World Class Performance: A Route to World Class Performance. Elsevier.
WIREMAN, T. (1990) World class maintenance management. New York, NY: Industrial Press.
XIA, T.; XI, L.; DU, S.; XIAO, L.; PAN, E. (2018) Energy-Oriented Maintenance Decision-Making for Sustainable Manufacturing Based on Energy Saving Window. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, v. 140, n. 5, p.1-12. DOI:10.1115/1.4038996.
YAN, J.; HUA, D. (2010) Energy consumption modeling for machine tools after preventive maintenance. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), p. 2201-2205.
ZHANG, Q. (2013) Case study of cost benefits of condition based maintenance used in medical devices. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2013 Proceedings-Annual, p. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517676.