Business process modeling: A webibliominig perspective of architecture frameworks
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the perspective of organizational context, the present paper deals with the different types of architecture of BPM. As objectives, it is proposed to formulate a conceptual comparative view of the main architectures present in the scientific literature. As for the methodology, bibliographical and webibliomining research are employed in a qualitative and quantitative approach to the subject. As a result, the comparative view of the UML, BPMN, CIMOSA, IDEF, ARIS, IEM, GRAI, GERAM and EKD architectures is developed, in terms of temporal aspects, socio-technical characteristics, visualization and analysis, among other factors which offers substantial argument to decide what framework is better in each scenario.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AMBLER, S. W. (2004) The object primer: Agile model-driven development with UML 2.0. Cambridge University Press.
ABDMOULEH, A.; SPADONI, M.; VERNADAT, F. (2004) Distributed client/server architecture for CIMOSA-based enterprise components. Computers in industry, v. 55, n. 3, p. 239-253.
AWADID, A.; NURCAN, S. (2016, June) Towards enhancing business process modeling formalisms of EKD with consistency consideration. In Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on, p. 1-12.
BARAT, S.; KULKARNI, V.; CLARK, T.; BARN, B. (2016) Enterprise modeling as a decision making aid: A systematic mapping study. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, p. 289-298, Springer, Cham.
BERNUS, P.; NORAN, O.; MOLINA, A. (2015) Enterprise architecture: Twenty years of the GERAM framework. Annual Reviews in Control, v. 39, p. 83-93.
BEVILACQUA, M.; MAZZUTO, G.; PACIAROTTI, C. (2014) A combined IDEF0 and FMEA approach to healthcare management reengineering. International Journal of Procurement Management, v. 8, n. 1-2, p. 25-43.
BOOCH, G.; RUMBAUGH, J.; JACOBSON, I. (2006) UML: guia do usuário. Elsevier Brasil.
BRAGHETTO, K. R.; FERREIRA, J. E.; VINCENT, J. M. (2011, October) Performance evaluation of business processes through a formal transformation to SAN. In European Performance Engineering Workshop, p. 42-56, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
BUBENKO, J. A.; PERSSON, A.; STIRNA, J. (2001) User guide of the knowledge management approach using enterprise knowledge patterns. Stockholm (Sweden), Department of Computer and Systems Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
CHINOSI, M.; TROMBETTA, A. (2012) BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces, v. 34, n. 1, p. 124-134.
CONFORTI, R.; DUMAS, M.; GARCÍA-BAÑUELOS, L.; LA ROSA, M. (2016) BPMN miner: automated discovery of BPMN process models with hierarchical structure. Information Systems, v. 56, p. 284-303.
COSÍO-LEÓN, M. A.; OJEDA-CARREÑO, D.; NIETO-HIPÓLITO, J. I.; IBARRA-HERNÁNDEZ, J. A. (2018) The use of standards in embedded devices to achieve end to end semantic interoperability on health systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces, n. 57, p. 68-73.
FOWLER, M. (2014) UML Essencial: um breve guia para linguagem padrão. Bookman Editora.
GHATREI, S. (2015) ARIS Enterprise Architecture's Usage Reviews. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, v. 3, n. 1, p. 57.
HAISJACKL, C.; SOFFER, P.; LIM, S. Y.; WEBER, B. (2018) How do humans inspect BPMN models: an exploratory study. Software & Systems Modeling, v. 17, n. 2, p. 655-673.
JIN G.; JÄKEL F. W. (2018) Execution and evaluation of enterprise models in IEM/MO 2 GO based on Petri net. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 96, n. 9-12, p. 4517-4537.
KARIM, S.; LIAWATIMENA, S.; TRISETYARSO, A.; ABBAS, B. S.; SUPARTA, W. (2017) Automating functional and structural software size measurement based on XML structure of UML sequence diagram. In Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom), 2017 IEEE International Conference, p. 24-28.
LAKHOUA, M. N.; RAHMOUNI, M. (2011) Investigation of the methods of the enterprise modeling. African Journal of Business Management, v. 5, n. 16, p. 6845.
LARMAN, C. (2002) Utilizando UML e padrões. Bookman Editora.
LATIFFIANTI, E.; SISWANTO, N.; WIRATNO, S. E.; SAPUTRA, Y. A. (2017) CIMOSA process classification for business process mapping in non-manufacturing firms: A case study. In AIP Conference Proceedings, v. 1902, n. 1, p. 020-040, AIP Publishing.
MENDLING, J.; RECKER, J.; REIJERS, H. A.; LEOPOLD, H. (2018) An Empirical Review of the Connection Between Model Viewer Characteristics and the Comprehension of Conceptual Process Models. Information Systems Frontiers, p. 1-25.
MOURA, P.; BORGES, R.; MOTA, A. (2003) Experimenting formal methods through UML. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Workshop on Formal Methods.
NADEZDA, Y.; FORESTI, G. L.; MICHELONI, C. (2017) An ADAS Design based on IoT V2X Communications to Improve Safety.
PANAYIOTOU, N. A.; STAVROU, V. P.; GAYIALIS, S. P. (2017) The application of a business process modeling architecture in the supply chain of a manufacturing company: A case study. In Operational Research in Business and Economics, p. 1-16, Springer, Cham.
PESSINI, T.; SANTANDER, V. F. A.; DA SILVA, I. F.; DE ANDRADE, S. C.; SCHEMBERGER, E. E. (2017) BP2UC: De Processos de Negócios Modelados com BPMN Simplificado para Casos de Uso UML. Revista Eletrônica Científica Inovação e Tecnologia, v. 1, n. 15, p. 2.
ROMERO, D.; VERNADAT, F. (2016) Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends. Computers in Industry, n. 79, p. 3-13.
ROSA, M. L.; VAN DER AALST, W. M.; DUMAS, M.; MILANI, F. P. (2017) Business process variability modeling: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v. 50, n. 1, p. 2.
SANTOS, F. M. D. (2012) Análise de conteúdo: a visão de Laurence Bardin.
ŠERIFI, V.; DAŠIĆ, P.; DAŠIĆ, J. (2008) Functional and information model of expert specialization using IDEF standard. Journal of Modelling and Optimization in the Machines Building Fields (MOCM), v. 14, n. 2, p. 268-279.
STIRNA, J.; PERSSON, A. (2009) Anti-patterns as a means of focusing on critical quality aspects in enterprise modeling. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, p. 407-418, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
SYCHENKO, V.; MIRONOV, D.; BIAŁOŃ, A. (2017) Structural–functional model of maintenance and repair of the traction substations equipment. TTS Technika Transportu Szynowego, 24.
TBAISHAT, D. (2017) Business process modelling using ARIS: process architecture. Library Management, v. 38, n. 2/3, p. 88-107.
TENIENTE, E.; WEIDLICH, M. (Eds.) (2018) Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2017 International Workshops, Barcelona, Spain, September 10-11, Revised Papers, v. 308, Springer.
VAN DER AALST, W. M. (2011) Process Discovery: An Introduction. In Process Mining, p. 125-156, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
VAN DER AALST, W. M.; ROSA, M.; SANTORO, F. M. (2016) Business process management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, v. 58, n. 1, p. 1.
VERNADAT, F. B. (2003) Enterprise modelling and integration. In Enterprise Inter-and Intra-Organizational Integration, p. 25-33, Springer, Boston, MA.
WEICHHART, G.; STARY, C.; VERNADAT, F. (2017) Enterprise modelling for interoperable and knowledge-based enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, p. 1-23.
YAN H.; PIETER V. G.; MEMBER, IEEE, KAYMAK U.; IEEE, XUDONG L.; LEI J.; CHOO C.; HENDRIKUS H. M. K.; HUILONG D. (2018) Aligning event logs to task-time matrix clinical pathways in BPMN for variance analysis. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, v. 22, n. 2, p. 311-317.
YILMAZ, N.; STIRNA, J. (2015) Factors influencing productization of enterprise modeling: a qualitative inquiry into the scandinavian strand of methods and tools. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, p. 193-208, Springer, Cham.
YU, X.; GU, P.; LIU, X.; SUN, L.; QIAN, D.; GUO, Y. (2017) Modeling technology of virtual assembly system based on UML. In Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), 2017 International conference of IEEE, v. 2, p. 722-726.
ZUR MUEHLEN, M.; RECKER, J. (2013) How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, p. 429-443, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.