Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability evaluation of the Lithuanian version of the keys questionnaire
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
The aim of this study is the KEYS questionnaire cross-cultural adaptation into the Lithuanian language. This study was designed to translate and perform cultural adaptation as well as test the reliability of the Lithuanian version of the KEYS questionnaire. Guidelines for the questionnaire translation and adaptation procedure according to international recommendations based on scientific literature were followed in order to establish the cultural equivalence to the original English version of the KEYS questionnaire. In the cross-cultural adaptation stage, due to the Lithuanian cultural context, several discrepancies between the semantic and conceptual equivalence of the items were modified. In total, 155 respondents participated in the pilot study of the Lithuanian KEYS version. As to reliability of the Lithuanian KEYS version, psychometric properties were tested, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency. Mostly all scales and items demonstrated good internal consistency. The Lithuanian KEYS version was a well-accepted, reliable tool for evaluating and assessing individual work environment perceptions that influence the creativity of organizations among the Lithuanian speaking population. We conclude that the Lithuanian version of the KEYS questionnaire was successfully translated and adapted for application to Lithuanian-speaking respondents and it is ready for the validation study. Such a research is the first in the Baltic region.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Agreli, H. F., Peduzzi, M., & Bailey, C. (2017). Contributions of team climate in the study of interprofessional collaboration: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(6), 679-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1351425
Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994). The Team Climate Inventory (TCI) and group innovation: A psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00557.x
Amabile, T. A. (2012). Componential Theory of Creativity. Harvard Business School. Working Paper. 12-096, April 26, 2012.
Amabile, T. M. (1995). KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). User’s Guide for KEYS: Assessing the Climate for Creativity. Greensboro: Centre for Creative Leadership.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creativity environment scales: Working environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534321
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1994). The team climate inventory manual and users’ guide. Windsor: Assessment Services for Employment/NFER-Nelson.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1996). The team climate inventory: The development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414840
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C
Arafat, S. M., Chowdhury, H. R., Shalahuddin Qusar, M. M. A., & Hafez, M. A. (2016). Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of Research Instruments: a Methodological Review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129-136. https://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20160615121755
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bosch, M., Dijkstra, R., Wensing, M., Van Der Weijden, T., & Grol, R. (2008). Organizational culture, team climate and diabetes care in small office-based practices. BMC Health Services Research, 8, Article number: 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-180
Brown, J. B., Ryan, B. L., Thorpe, C., Markle, E. K. R., Hutchison, B., & Glazier, R. H. (2015). Measuring Teamwork in Primary Care: Triangulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Data. Families Systems & Health, 33(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000109
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Ensor, J., Cottam, A., & Band, C. (2001). Fostering knowledge management through the creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016555150102700304
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, R. M. J., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, Article number: 13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417-1432. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
Hunter, S., T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410709336883
Kivimäki, M., & Elovainio, M. (1999). A shorter version of the Team Climate Inventory: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166644
Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). Exploring the team dynamic learning process in software process tailoring performance A theoretical perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(3), 502-518. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0266666917724194
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., & Costa, L. O. P. (2007). The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 11(4), 245-252. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000400002
Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments within Organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
Mohamed, M. (2005). Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 24(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510572326
Ouwens, M., Hulscher, M., Akkermans, R., Hermens, R., Grol, R., & Wollersheim, H. (2008). The Team Climate Inventory: application in hospital teams and methodological considerations. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17(4), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.021543
Primus, D. J., & Jiang, C. X. (2019). Crafting better team climate: the benefits of using creative methods during team initiation. International Journal of Technology Management, 79(3-4), 299-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2019.099606
Ramos, M. A. W., Figueiredo, P. S., & Pereira-Guizzo, C. (2018). Antecedents of innovation in industry: The impact of work environment factors on creative performance. Innovation & Management Review, 15(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0032
Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256701
Van Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D. A., De Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M., & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Assessment Instruments Used in Psychological Research With Children and Families. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1
Vveinhardt, J., Fominiene, V. B., Streimikiene, D. (2020). A new tool contributing to the management of bullying and harassment in higher education institutions. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 446-461. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.31
West, M., & Sacramento, C. (2012). Creativity and innovation: the role of team and organizational climate. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 359-385). London (UK): Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00015-X
Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258761