Do informal groups threaten organizations? Comparing group conflict management styles with supervisors
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
This research aims to identify the role played by informal groups in organizational conflict. The existing literature mainly focuses on the effects of informal groups on the behaviors of employees, such as resisting management and disobeying instructions. However, studies that specifically measure how informal groups affect the behaviors of their members in handling conflicts with supervisors are lacking. This research uses quantitative methodology. Data were collected using the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory II survey. The participants were 316 workers in various American organizations. The results were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and the two-samples z-test. The results show that employees who belong to informal groups use the dominating style more frequently than do employees who do not belong to informal groups. However, they do not always use dominating styles; occasionally, they tend to use compromising and integrating styles as well. Age has a significant impact on the relationship between informal groups and integrating and dominating styles. There is also a relationship between gender and avoiding style among employees who belong to informal groups. However, there is no preference for a certain conflict style among the three types of informal groups. The results have implications for management science, including human resources and organizational behavior. However, the research applications may be limited for employees in collectivist societies that are different from American (an individualistic society). The relationship between informal groups and conflict style with supervisors has not been studied before. Thus, this research focuses on not only the five conflict styles but also the influence of demographic variables to comprehensively understand this relationship.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Agarwal, R. D. (1982). Organization and Management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Al-Hamdan, Z., Norrie, P., & Anthony, D. (2014). Conflict management styles used by nurses in Jordan. Journal of Research in Nursing, 19(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987112466085.
Anderton, D. L., Barrett, R. E., & Bogue, D. J. (2010). The Population of the United States, 3 ed. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Appannaiah, H., Reddy, P., & Kavitha, B. R. (2009). Organisational Behaviour. Global Media. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3011144.
Aswathappa, K. (2009). Organisational Behaviour. Global Media. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3011153.
Bode, T. (2014). The relationship between action identification and style of processing for managers and non-managers in the U.S. manufacturing industry. Dissertation (Doctorate in Business), Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1525999375?accountid=35493. Access: 1/1/2020
Borkowski, N. (2016). Organizational behavior, theory, and design in health care, 2 ed. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Dainton, M. (2015). An interdependence approach to relationship maintenance in interracial marriage. Journal of Social, 71(4), 772-787. doi:10.1111/josi.12148
De Beer, A., Rossouw, D., Moolman, B., Le Roux, E., & Labuschagne, M. (1998). Focus on supervision in general management. South Africa: Kenwyn.
Deb, S. (2001). Contemporary issues on management. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
Fallon, L. F., Begun, J. W., & Riley, W. J. (2013). Managing health organizations for quality and performance. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.
Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2005). Working through conflict: strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations, 5 ed., Massachusetts: Pearson Education.
Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics, 5 ed. California: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
French, R., Rayner, C., Rees, G., Rumbles, S., Schermerhorn, J., Hunt, J., & Osborn, R.. (2011). Organizational behaviour, 2 ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Gamage, D. T. (2006). Professional development for leaders and managers of self-governing schools. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4929-3
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. California: Sage Publications.
Harper, A. A. (2016). The impact of consumer security awareness on adopting the internet of things: A correlational study. Dissertation (Doctorate in Business). Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1853097232?accountid=35493. Access: 1/2/2020
Hatch, M. J. (2011). Organizations: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199584536.001.0001
Hiriyappa, B. (2008). Organizational behavior. New Age International. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=414236.
Holt, J. L., & Devore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 165-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002.
Hussein, R. T. (1989). Informal groups, leadership and productivity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 10(1), 9-16. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EUM0000000001130/full/html. Access: 15/12/2019 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001130
Hussein, R. T. (1990). Understanding and managing informal groups. Management Decision, 28(8), 36-41. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00251749010000038/full/html. Access: 10/12/2019 https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749010000038
Jain, S. (2010). Gender perspective on conflict resolution styles of aspiring Indian managers. Asia Pacific Business Review, 6(4), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/097324701000600410
Jeong, H. W. (2010). Conflict management and resolution. New York: Routledge.
Khanka, S. S. (2006). Organisational behaviour: Text and cases. India: S. Chand.
Kroon, J. (1995). General management, 2 ed. South Africa: Pretoria.
Lashley, C., & Lee-Ross, D. (2003). Organization behaviour for leisure services, 1 ed. Massachusetts: Routledge.
Lee, R., & Lawrence, P. (2013). Organizational behaviour: politics at work. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Lune, H. (2010). Understanding Organizations. United Kingdom: Polity Press.
Maiese, M. (2003). Moral or value conflicts. Available: https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/intolerable-moral-differences. Access: 7/15/2020
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50,(4), 370-396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
Mosely, D. C., Megginson, L. C., & Pietri, P. H. (2015). Supervisory management: The art of inspiring, empowering, and developing people, 9 ed. Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
Mukherjee, S., & Basu, S. K. (2005). Organisation & management and business communication, 1 ed. India: New Age International.
Mukhtar, S. A. (2013). Organizational conflict management strategies on employee job satisfaction: A conceptual relationship. IJMRR, 3(5), 2855-2862.
Mullins, L. J. (2007). Management and organisational behaviour, 8 ed. United Kingdom: Pearson Education. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5139571. Access: 15/11/2019
Nair, S. R. (2009). Organisational behaviour. Global Media. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3011339.
Plunkett, W. R., Allen, G., & Attner, R. F. (2013). Management: Meeting and exceeding customer expectations. Ohio: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3_suppl), 1323-1344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.3c.1323
Rahim, M. A. (2001). Managing conflict in organizations. 3rd ed. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022874
Rahim, M. A. (2011). Managing conflict in organizations, 4 ed. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-469.
Rao, V., & Krishna, H. V. (2002). Management: Text and cases, 1 ed. India: Excel Books.
Rao, P. S. (2010). Organisational behaviour, 1 ed. Himalaya Publishing House. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nbuniv-ebooks/detail.action?docID=618259. Access: 1/1/2020
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Singh, B. D. (2008). Managing conflict and negotiation. New Delhi: Excel Books.
Shockley-Zalabak, P. S., & Morley, D. D. (1984). Sex differences in conflict style preferences. Communication Research Reports, 1,(1), 28-32.
Slocum, J. W., & Hellriegel, D. (2007). Organizational behavior, 11 ed. Ohio: Western Cengage Learning.
Ukpe, I. (2018). Psychological empowerment and employee involvement in organizational change: The role of commitment to change. Dissertation (Doctorate in Business).. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1853097232?accountid=35493. Access: 1/11/2019
Weller, L. D., &Weller, S. (2002). The assistant principal: Essentials for effective school leadership. California: Corwin Press.
Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2007). Interpersonal conflict, 7 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zayed, A. M., & Kamel, M. M. (2005). Teams and group works. Egypt: CAPSCU. Available at http://www.pathways.cu.edu.eg/subpages/training_courses/C5-Teams-EN.pdf. Access: 20/11/2019