Financial knowledge for corporate boards: what should board members know?

Main Article Content

José Miguel Pinto dos Santos

Abstract

Although there is a vast body of research on corporate governance and corporate boards, no one seems to have addressed yet the following question: What should corporate board members know of financial theory and practice to properly discharge their fiduciary responsibilities? The lack of reflection on this issue is somewhat surprising given the central role financial matters are supposed to play in board’s discussions and decision making. The objective of this study is to offer a first reflection on this question. Different views of what a corporation is and who “owns” it, whether it is only shareholders or also a broader set of other stakeholders, result in different requirements concerning the financial knowledge board members should have. One such view is agency theory which considers that the main role of management is to create value for shareholders. From this perspective it will follow that board members should understand primarily the dynamics of value creation, with the concomitant focus on long-term strategy formulation. Another view is stakeholder theory which stresses the importance of the survival of the corporation. In this case the board should be conversant primarily with short term financial management, specially cash or liquidity management. The counterintuitive result is that when the board gives priority to the interests of shareholders, in opposition to the interests of other stakeholders beyond what law and good commercial and management practice recommends, it should focus primarily on long time value creation, while the more inclusive stakeholder view requires more attention on short-term cash management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

José Miguel Pinto dos Santos, AESE Business School

José Miguel Pinto dos Santos holds a PhD in Economics from Hiroshima University (1995) and a PhD in History from Universidade Nova de Lisboa (2012). Since 2006 he has been Full Professor of Finance at AESE Business School (Lisbon), having previously been Assistant Professor (from 1995 to 2000) and Associate Professor at Faculty of Economics of Hiroshima University (from 2000 to 2006).

He has also been invited professor at Hiroshima University of Economics (2001-2011), Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology (2009-2011), Keio University (2018-2019) and Meiji University (2019). 

From 2010 to 2017 he was member of the Accreditation Board of the EFMD Programme Accreditation System.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-4313

References

Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.

Balotti, R. F., & Finkelstein (2017). Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organizations Statutory Deskbook, 2017 ed. New York: Wolters Klugen Law & Business.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Baumol, W. J. (1959). Business Behavior, Value and Growth, New York: Macmillan.

Baxt, B. (2016). Duties and Responsabilities of Directors and Officers, 18th ed., Sydney NSW: Australian Institute of Company Directors.

Bierce, A. (1911). The Devil’s Dictionary, Cleveland: The World Publishing Company.

Bostock, T. (2000). To Whom Are Duties of a Company Director Owed? Unpublished Manuscript, Australian Institute of Company Directors and Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, The University of Melbourne: 1-20, Available: https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/1710172/138-bostock1.pdf. Access: 20/03/2020.

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2016). Principles of Corporate Finance, 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Business Roundtable (2019). Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation. Available: https://opportunity.businessroundtable.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/BRT-Statement-on-the-Purpose-of-a-Corporation-with-Signatures-Updated-April-2020.pdf. Access: 24/04/2020.

Clark, R. C. (1986). Corporate Law, Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

Conger, J. A., Lawler III, E. E., & Finegold, D. L. (2001). Corporate Boards: Strategies for Adding value at the Top, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Copeland, T. E., & Weston, J. F. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 3rd ed., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Cushing, H. A. (1915). Voting Trusts: A Chapter in Recent Corporation History. New York, McMillan Company.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and Shareholder Returns, Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64.

Drucker, P. F. (1954). The Practice of Management, New Cork: Harper & Row.

Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1989). The Corporate Contract. Columbia Law Review, 89(7), 1416-1448.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

Fama, E. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.

Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.

Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1984, available: http://umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf. Access: 27/4/2020.

Japanese Government, Shōhō (Code of Commercial Law), §254, available: https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=132AC0000000048. Access: 27/04/2020.

Gelter, M., & Helleringer, G. (2015). Lift Not the Painted Veil! To Whom Are Directors’ Duties Really Owed?, University of Illinois Law Review, 2015(3), 1069 -1118, available: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/963. Access 4/04/2020.

Jansen, M. B. (1992). China in the Tokugawa World, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Jensen, M.; Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jensen, M. C. (2000). A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Kojima Y. (1989). Murayama Toan: Sono Ai to Junan. Nagasaki: Seibo no Kishi-sha.

Laski, H. J. (1917). The Early History of the Corporation in England, Harvard Law Review, 30(6), 561-588.

Mcwilliams A., Van Fleet, D. D., & Cory, K. D. (2002). Raising Rivals’ costs through political strategy: An Extension of the Resource-Based Theory, Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 707-723.

Mcwilliams A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investments, American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.

Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2008). Corporate Governance, 4th edition. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Montgomery, C. A., & Kaufman, R. (2003). The Board’s Missing Link, Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 86-93.

Ochiai S., Kanda Y., & Kondo K. (1999). Shōhō II Kaisha, 3rd revised Edition. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

Palacios, J. (2003). Finanzas Para Consejos de Administración. Unpublished manuscript, V Encuentro Internacional de Professores de Política de Empresa, Instituto Internacional San Telmo, Sevilla, p. 1-25.

Raymond, R. L. (1906) The Genesis of the Corporation, Harvard Law Review, 19(5), 350-365.

Rumelt, R. (1984). Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in: Lamb R. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Taylor, B. (2003). Corporate Governance: The Crisis, Investors’ Losses and the Decline in Public Trust, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 155-163.

Williamson, O. E. (1964). The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Wolters Kluger Portugal (2006). Código das Sociedades Comerciais, Lisboa: Diário Económico, 2006, p. 58, §64.