A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to order natural gas consuming countries

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Apr 1, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i2.1287
Keywords:
natural gas ordering countries multi-criteria decision-making WINGS TOPSIS PROMÉTHÉE

Main Article Content

Ester Figueiredo Girão
IBMEC-RJ
Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes
IBMEC-RJ

Abstract

Societies worldwide are committed to moving towards a low carbon economy, and natural gas is considered a transition fuel between fossil (such as gasoline and diesel) and renewable fuels. Based on the relevance of natural gas in this economic transition, this paper demonstrates the application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to order the natural gas consuming countries. The aim is to support decision-making in the natural gas market, offering elements to prioritize the trade worldwide. The study observed three criteria: consumption variation for years 2014 to 2016; the volume of production in the same period; and proven natural gas reserves in 2016. The data to demonstrate the countries’ performance was obtained from a yearly statistic publication of the Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Biofuels (ANP), released in 2017. Finally, the decision-making methods adopted to assess the criteria were, first, the WINGS method, applied to generate the weights of each criterion. Second, the study adopted the TOPSIS method to pre-select the countries closest to becoming a global consumer of natural gas. After applying the TOPSIS method, a pre-analysis of dominance among alternatives (pre-selected countries) was conducted, excluding the dominated ones from the list obtained. Third, the PROMÉTHÉE II method was applied to establish the order of the natural gas-consuming countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Independent Journal of Management & Production
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).

 

Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

 

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

 

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

 

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).


d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
     Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
           Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
           Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
                  The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
                  The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
           At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
      Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Anp (2017). Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis 2017. Available: http://www.anp.gov.br/publicacoes/anuario-estatistico/3819-anuario-estatistico-2017. Access: September 13, 2018.

Bana E Costa, C. A., Corte, J. M., & Vansnick, J. C. (2005). On the Matemathical foundations of MACBETH. In: Figueira, J., & Greco, S. (eds.).. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York: Springer, 78, 409-442.

Barba-Romero, S., & Promerol, J. C. (1997). Decisiones multicriterio: fundamentos teóricos y utilización prática. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá.

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press,1-5.

Bilgin, M. (2009). Geopolitics of European natural gas demand: Supplies from Russia, Caspian and the Middle East. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4482-4492.

Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228-238.

Energy Information Administration – EIA (2009). International Energy Outlook 2009. DOE/EIA-0484.

Energy Information Administration – EIA (2010). International Energy Outlook 2010. DOE/EIA-0484.

Energy Information Administration – EIA (2017). Annual Energy Outlook 2017: with projections to 2050. Available: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017)..pdf. Access: September 04, 2018.

Energy Information Administration – EIA (2018). Annual Energy Outlook 2018: with projections to 2050. Available: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2018.pdf. Acess: March 13, 2019.

European Commission – EC (2008). Second Strategic Energy Review: Securing our Energy Future.

European Commission – EC (2009). The January 2009 Gas Supply Disruption to the EU: An Assessment, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying Document.

Faramawy, S., Zaki, T., & Sakr, A. (2016). Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 34, 34-54, June.

Gomes, L. F. A. M., Araya, M. C. G., & Carignano, C. (2004). Tomada de decisões em cenários complexos: introdução aos métodos discretos do apoio multicritério à decisão. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning.

Gomes, L. F. A. M., Gomes, C. F. S., & Almeida, A. T. (2006). Tomada de decisão gerencial: enfoque multicritério. 2ª edição. São Paulo: Atlas.

Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Maranhão, F. J. C. (2008). A Exploração de gás natural em Mexilhão: análise multicritério pelo método TODIM. Pesquisa Operacional, 28(3), 491-509, Set./Dez. 2008.

Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Gomes, C. F. S. (2014). Tomada de decisão gerencial: enfoque multicritério. 5a ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Maranhão, F. J. C. (2008). A Exploração de gás natural em Mexilhão: análise multicritério pelo método TODIM. Pesquisa Operacional, 28(3), 491-509, September/December.

Helen, H. (2010). The EU’s Energy Security Dilemma with Russia. University of Leeds. Polis Journal, 4, 1-40, Winter.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

International Energy Agency - IEA. (2017). GAS 2017: Analyis and Forecasts to 2022. Market Report Series.

International Energy Agency - IEA. (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018. International Energy. Agency: France.

Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khosravanian, R., & Wood. D. A. (2016). Selection of high-rate gas well completion designs applying multicriteria decision making and hierarchy methods. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 34, 1004-1016.

Leão JR., J. C. F. (2007). Seleção de Carteira de Projetos Exploratórios em Etapas: Agrupamento, Corte e Ordenação. Thesis (Master in Administration). – Rio de Janeiro, Faculdades Ibmec, Rio de Janeiro. 327.

Mac Kinnon, M. A; Brouwer, J., & Samuelsen, S. (2018). The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integration. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 64, 62- 92, January.

Michnik, J. (2013). Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS). - An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 536-544, 2013.

Miettinen, K. (2014). Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems. Operations Research Spectrum, 36(1), 3–37.

Mladineo, M; Jajac, N., & Rogulj, K. (2016). A simplified approach to the promethee method for priority setting in management of mine action projects. Croatian Operational Research Review, 7(2), Prosinac.

Neves, R. B., Pereira, V., & Costa, H. G. (2015). Auxílio multicritério à decisão aplicado ao planejamento e gestão na indústria de petróleo e gás. Production, 25(1), 43-53, January/March.

Pomerol, J. C., & Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Radetzki, M. (1999). European natural gas: market forces will bring about competition in any case. Energy Policy, 27(1), 17-24.

Romero, C. (1993). Teoría de la decisión multicriterio: conceptos, técnicas y aplicaciones. Madrid: Alianza. p. 195.

Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la decision: methods et cas. Paris: Economica.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

Santos, E. M., Zamalloa, G. C., Villanueva, L. D., Fagá, M. T. D. (2002). Gás natural: estratégias para uma energia nova no Brasil. São Paulo: Annablume. 1, 348 p.

Vincke, P. H. (1989). L’aide multicritère à la dècision. Bruxelles: Éditions de l´Université de Bruxelles. 179 p.

Zhong, M., & Bazilian, M. D. (2018). Contours of the energy transition: Investment by international oil and gas companies in renewable energy. The Electricity Journal, 31(1), 82-91, January/February.

فروشگاه اینترنتی