Relationship between food industries maturity and quality certification
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the PDP (Product Development Process) maturity level in the food industry to identify the compatibility status of their quality certification and their maturity level.
Design/methodology/approach: A bibliographical review was conducted about product development, maturity process, and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). An adapted method from CMMI was used, which allows evaluating the level of maturity, through a semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaires were applied in five companies of this industry and then, an analysis of the information obtained in each company was carried out and compared, aiming to understand the sector maturity.
Findings: After conducting the interviews in each company, the median of each group of questions was calculated, according to the methodology described. Data collected from this sector show consistency between certification time and maturity level.
Research limitations/implications: Due to the low number of respondents, this data cannot be generalized to this sector, being considered only an indication of the situation of the food industry located in Curitiba region.
Practical implications: This study shows the relationship between the maturity level of food industry and ISO 9001 quality certification. The study shows that for the company to obtain an ISO certification, it must have been at least maturity level 2, highlighting, as well, the main deficiencies of this sector.
Originality/value: The original value is to show the relationship between the maturity level of food industry and ISO 9001 quality certification.Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
BACK, N.; OGLIARI, A.; DIAS, A.; SILVA, J. C. (2008) Draft Integrated Products. Planning, Design and Modeling. Barueri: Manole.
BAMFORD, R. C.; DEIBLER, J. W. (1993) Comparing, contrasting IS0 9001 and the SEI capability maturity model. USA: Ed.IEE
Brazilian National Standards Organization (2015) NBR ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management System - Requirements Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Brazilian Association of Food Industries, ABIA, Annual Report of the Brazilian Association of Food Industries 2015. São Paulo, SP. [Online], Available at: https://www.abia.org.br/vsn/ (accessed 26 April 2015)
CARVALHO, M. M.; PALADINI, E. P. (2005) Quality management: theory and cases. Rio de Janeiro : Elsevier.
CERQUEIRA, J. P. E. (2006) Integrated management systems: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, SA 8000, NBR 16001: concepts and applications. Rio de Janeiro : Qualitymark.
DAVID, M.; IDELMERFAA, Z.; RICHARD, J. (2005) Managing and Organizing Concurrent Processes According to the CMM Levels. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, v. 13, n. 3, p. 241 -251.
DELLANA, S.; F. KROS, J. (2014) An exploration of quality management practices, perceptions and program maturity in the supply chain, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 34, n. 6, p. 786-806.
DONAIRE, D. (1997) The use of case study as a research method in the administration area. IMES journal, year XIV, n. 40, p. 9 -19.
ERIKSSON, H.; GREMYR, I.; BERGQUIST, B.; GARVARE, R.; FUNDIN, A.; WIKLUND, H.; SÖRQVIST, L. (2016) Exploring quality challenges and the validity of excellence models, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1201-1221.
ESCRIG, A. B.; DE MENEZES, L. M. (2016) What is the effect of size on the use of the EFQM excellence model?, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 36, n. 12, p. 1800-1820.
ESTORILIO, C. C. A.; CAN, R. K. (2010) The reduction of irregularities in the use of process FMEA. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management., v. 27, p. 721-733.
ESTORILIO, C. C. A.; VAZ, G. R. M.; LISBOA, F. C.; BESSA, L. O. F. (2015) The relationship between industrial process maturity and quality certification. International Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces, v. 39, p. 22-33.
ESTORILIO, C. C. A.; SIMIAO, M.C.; SCHONOSKI, C.L.; LARA, M.C. (2008) Study of reducing manufacturing cost and assembly in a diesel engine with the aid of DFMA. Product & Production (Print), v. 9, p. 5-14.
FIEP, Federation of Industries of the State of Parana. (2007) In: Database directory of the Registry of Industries of Paraná. Curitiba, CD- ROM.
FULLER, G. W. (1997) New Food Product Development : From Concept Marketplace, CRC Press LLC, Florida.
GARZÁS, J.; PINO, F. J.; PIATTINI, M.; FERNÁNDEZ, C. M. (2013) A maturity model for the Spanish software industry based on ISO standards, Computer Standards and Interfaces, v. 35, n. 6, p. 616-628.
GHOBADIAN, A.; GALLEAR, D. (1997) TQM and organization size, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 17, n. 2, p. 121-163.
HELGESSON, Y. Y. L.; HÖST, M.; WEYNS, K. (2012) A review of methods for evaluation of maturity models for process improvement, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, v. 24, n. 4, p. 436-454.
JOCHEM, R.; GEERS, D.; HEINZE, P. (2011) Maturity measurement of knowledge‐intensive business processes, The TQM Journal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 377-387.
LISBOA, F. C. (2010) Maturity of Product Development and Quality Assurance Process: coherence found on Two Wheels Pole of Manaus. 2010. 134 f. Thesis (MSc in Engineering) - Graduate Program in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Manaus.
LOCKAMY, A.; MCCORMACK, K. (2004) The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 272-278.
LOURENZANI, A. E. S. B.; TOLEDO, J. C.; LOURENZANI, W. L. (2002) Portfolio management - a case study in the food industry. Product Management Development, v. 1, n. 3.
MELLO, C. H. P. (2002) ISO 9001:2000: a quality management system for production and service operations. Sao Paulo: Atlas.
MOTT, J. D. (2001) ISO - 9000: Beyond Certification. London: Philip Crosby Associates.
OLIVEIRA, O.; J. FLORIAN, M. C. (2013) Implementation and ISO 9001 certification in a food service company. In: Symposium Engenhria Production, Proceedings, Bauru - SP.
OLIVEIRA, A. W. (2005) Maturity Models: Overview. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Mundo, 81p.
PAHL, G.; BEITZ, W. (2005) Design in Engineering: Fundamentals of Effective Product Development, Methods and Applications. 6. Ed. Sao Paulo: Edgard Blücher.
PĂUNESCU, C.; ACATRINEI, C. (2012) Managing maturity in process-based improvement organizations: a perspective of the Romanian companies, Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 13, n. 2, p. 223-241.
QUINTELLA, H.L.M.; ROCHA, H.M. (2007) Maturity and comparison of PDPs automotive products. Production, Sao Paulo, v. 17, n. 1.
ROSS, J. E. (2017) Total quality management: Text, cases, and readings. Routledge.
ROZENFELD, H.; FORCELLINI, F. A.; AMARAL, D. C.; TOLEDO, J. C.; SILVA, S. L.; ALLIPRANDINI, D. H.; SCALICE, R. K. (2006) Management of product development: a reference for process improvement. Sao Paulo: Saraiva, 542 p.
SEBRAE / SC. (2013) Classification criteria for companies. Santa Catarina :. SEBRAESC, 2013 Available at: <http://www.sebrae-sc.com.br/leis/default.asp?vcdtexto=4154> Accessed on: May 8, 2013
SEI, Software Engineering Institute. (2010) CMMI for Development: Process Improvement Aiming Best Products (CMMI - DEV), Version 1.3. ed. Carnegie Mellon. Pittsburgh, PA, August 2010.
TEAM, S. U. (2011) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document.
THELEN, M. J. (1997) Integrating process improvement, ISO 9000 and TQM in SITA Research and Development, The TQM Magazine, v. 9, n. 4, p. 265-269.
TONINI, A. C.; CARVALHO, M. M.; SPINOLA, M. M. (2008) Contribution of quality models and maturity in software process improvement. On- Line Production, v. 18, n. 2, p. 275-286.
VAZ, G. R. M. (2010) Maturity of Product Development and Quality Assurance Process: Coherence Found in Electrical and Electronic Industry of Manaus. 2010. 128 f. Thesis (MSc in Engineering) - Graduate Program in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Curitiba.
YIN, R. K. (2010) Case Study: Design and Methods. 4. Ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.