The Economic Sociology of New Venture Creation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
In fact, [new] economic sociology is a meeting place for economists and sociologists. It is a rejection of the maximization hypothesis of orthodox economic theory. Thus its approach regarding new venture creation might be controversial. This paper attempts to connect these two areas, following a qualitative approach. Findings show that three main elements, i.e. (i) social action, (ii) embeddedness, and (iii) social relations, affect new venture creation. These elements are elaborated in this research and three main propositions are proposed.
Downloads
Article Details
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
AGUILERA, R. V.; JACKSON, G. (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of management Review, v. 28, n. 3, p. 447-465.
ALDRICH, H. E.; CLIFF, J. E. (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of business venturing, v. 18, n. 5, p. 573-596.
ALMANDOZ, J. (2012) Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, v. 55, n. 6, p. 1381-1406.
ARREGLE, J. L.; BATJARGAL, B.; HITT, M. A.; WEBB, J. W.; MILLER, T.; TSUI, A. S. (2015) Family ties in entrepreneurs' social networks and new venture growth.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 39, n. 2, p. 313-344.
ASPKRS, P. (1999) The economic sociology of Alfred Marshall: an overview. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 58, n. 4, p. 651-667.
BANDELJ, N. (2009) Toward Economic Sociology of Work: Economic Sociology of Work, London, UK: Emerald Publishing.
BECKERT, J.; ZAFIROVSKI, M. (Eds.) (2013) International encyclopedia of economic sociology. Routledge.
CARSRUD, A. L.; JOHNSON, R. W. (1989) Entrepreneurship: a social psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, v. 1, n. 1, p. 21-31.
CHANG, E. P.; MEMILI, E.; CHRISMAN, J. J.; KELLERMANNS, F. W.; CHUA, J. H. (2009) Family social capital, venture preparedness, and start-up decisions: A study of Hispanic entrepreneurs in New England. Family Business Review, v. 22, n. 3, p. 279-292.
CONVERT, B.; HEILBRON, J. (2007) Where did the new economic sociology come from?. Theory and Society, v. 36, n. 1, p. 31-54.
DE CAROLIS, D. M.; LITZKY, B. E.; EDDLESTON, K. A. (2009) Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, v. 33, n. 2, p. 527-545.
DE CLERQ, D.; ARENIUS, P. (2002) Effects of human capital and social capital on entrepreneurial activity. In Babson College, Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BKERC) (v. 2006).
DIMOV, D. (2007) Beyond the single‐person, single‐insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 31, n. 5, p. 713-731.
GRANOVETTER, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, p. 481-510.
GRANOVETTER, M. (2000) A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. Stanford University.
GRANOVETTER, M. (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 19, n. 1, p. 33-50.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D.; SALAMZADEH, A. (2015) Entrepreneurial transformation in the Middle East: experiences from Tehran Universities. Technics Technologies Education Management, v. 10, n. 4, p. 533-537.
HERMES, J.; MAINELA, T. (2015) Institutional entrepreneuring in erratic environments. Context, Process and Gender in Entrepreneurship: Frontiers in European Entrepreneurship Research, v. 34, n. 4.
HINRICHS, C. C. (2000) Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of rural studies, v. 16, n. 3, p. 295-303.
HITE, J. M. (2005) Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, v. 29, n. 1, p. 113-144.
HOANG, H.; ANTONCIC, B. (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of business venturing, v. 18, n. 2, p. 165-187.
JAGD, S. (2007) Economics of Convention and New Economic Sociology Mutual Inspiration and Dialogue. Current Sociology, v. 55, n. 1, p. 75-91.
KLOFSTEN, M. (2005) New venture ideas: an analysis of their origin and early development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 105-119.
KOLVEREID, L.; ISAKSEN, E. J. (2012) The Psychology of the Entrepreneur'. Perspectives in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Approach, p. 27-39.
MALTERUD, K. (2001) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The lancet, v. 3, n. 58, p. 483-488.
MARQUIS, C.; LOUNSBURY, M. (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, v. 50, n. 4, p. 799-820.
MILLER, M. L. (1986) Reliability and validity in qualitative research. NY: Sage.
MITCHELL, T. (2008) Rethinking economy. Geoforum, 39(3), 1116-1121.
MORGAN, D. L.; SPANISH, M. T. (1984) Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative sociology, v. 7, n. 3, p. 253-270.
PEREDO, A. M.; CHRISMAN, J. J. (2006) Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 2, p. 309-328.
PORTES, A.; SENSENBRENNER, J. (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American journal of sociology, p. 1320-1350.
RATTEN, V. (2011) Social entrepreneurship and innovation in sports.International journal of social entrepreneurship and innovation, v. 1, n. 1, p. 42-54.
RICHTER, R. (2015) New economic sociology and new institutional economics. In Essays on New Institutional Economics, p. 51-75. Springer International Publishing.
RUTTEN, R.; BOEKEMA, F. (2007) Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 74, n. 9, p. 1834-1846.
SALAMZADEH, A. (2015) New Venture Creation: Controversial Perspectives and Theories. Economic Analysis, v. 48, n. 3-4, p. 101-109.
SALAMZADEH, A.; KAWAMORITA KESIM, H. (2015) Startup Companies: Life Cycle and Challenges. In 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE), Belgrade, Serbia.
SALAMZADEH, A.; AZIMI, M. A.; KIRBY, D. A. (2013) Social entrepreneurship education in higher education: insights from a developing country. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, v. 20, n. 1, p. 17-34.
SALAMZADEH, A.; FARJADIAN, A. A.; AMIRABADI, M.; MODARRESI, M. (2014) Entrepreneurial characteristics: insights from undergraduate students in Iran. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165-182.
SALINETTI, E. (2013) New business formation in business networks, Doctoral dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana.
SMELSER, N. J. (2013) The sociology of economic life. Quid Pro Books.
STEIER, L. P.; CHUA, J. H.; CHRISMAN, J. J. (2009) Embeddedness perspectives of economic action within family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 33, n. 6, p. 1157-1167.
SWEDBERG, R. (1990) Economics and Sociology: redefining their boundaries: conversations with economists and sociologists. Princeton University Press.
SWEDBERG, R. (1997) New economic sociology: What has been accomplished, what is ahead?. Acta Sociologica, v. 40, n. 2, p. 161-182.
SWEDBERG, R. (1998) Max Weber's manifesto in economic sociology. European Journal of Sociology, v. 39, n. 02, p. 379-398.
SWEDBERG, R. (2000) Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. Princeton University Press.
SWEDBERG, R. (2004) What has been accomplished in new economic sociology and where is it heading?. European Journal of Sociology, v. 45, n. 03, p. 317-330.
SWEDBERG, R. (2009) Principles of economic sociology. Princeton University Press.
ULHØI, J. P. (2005) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Technovation, v. 25, n. 8, p. 939-946.
UZZI, B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review, p. 674-698.
WILLIAMS MIDDLETON, K. (2011) Facilitating entrepreneurial behavior development through learning. In Nordic Academy of Management Meeting (NFF) Conference, Stockholm.
ZAFIROVSKI, M. (1999) Economic Sociology in Retrospect and Prospect. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 58, n. 4, p. 583-627.
ZANJANI, S. S.; GHOLAMALI, A.; ABBASI, D. (2013) Social Networks and the Success of SMEs in Media Industries. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, v. 1, n. 1/2, p. 125–139.