Evaluation of occupational safety conditions in a waste plastic recycling plant in Brazil
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
صندلی اداریAbstract
The adequacy of working conditions to safety standards has a fundamental importance in the company's environment. The efficient implementation of an Occupational Health and Safety Management System allows the reduction of risks associated with accidents; reduce costs to the employer and a strong ally in the competitive market when the safety indicator is a decisive factor in the choice of suppliers. The aim of this study was to evaluate occupational safety and health (OSH) practices at work in a plastic recycling plant located in northeastern Brazil, as well as to identify opportunities for improvement. Data collection was carried out from on-site visits and control measures were proposed for the risk factors identified. The evaluation made it possible to identify that the recycling activity is characterized by several occupational hazards, which are aggravated by inadequate working conditions. The non-conformity of jobs, the use of obsolete equipment and the lack of specific training to perform certain functions were identified as the most relevant aspects. For these, opportunities for improvement and adequation were connected. The study results can help other companies that perform the same activities to improve their performance in OSH based on the points of improvement presented.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Aburumman, M., Newnam, S., & Fildes, B. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of workplace interventions in improving safety culture: A systematic review. Safety science, 115, 376-392.
Benite, A. G. (2004). Sistemas de Gestão da Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho. São Paulo: O Nome da Rosa.
Burns, K., Sun, K., Fobil, J., & Neitzel, R. (2016). Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1), 140. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010140
Cioca, L. I., Ferronato, N., Viotti, P., Magaril, E., Ragazzi, M., Torretta, V., & Rada, E. C. (2018). Risk assessment in a materials recycling facility: Perspectives for reducing operational issues. Resources, 7(4), 85. doi.org/10.3390/resources7040085
Cockell, F. F., De Carvalho, A. M. C, Camarotto, J. A, & Bento, P. E. G. (2004). A triagem de lixo reciclável: análise ergonômica da atividade. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 29(110), 17-26. doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572004000200003
Goodship, V. (2007). Plastic recycling. Science Progress, 90(4), 245–268. doi:10.3184/003685007x228748
Guimarães, P. P., Fiedler, N. C., da Silva Oliveira, J. T., Leite, Â. M. P., & De Souza Lima, J. S. (2018). Análise ergonômica do ambiente de Trabalho na fabricação de ferramentas florestais. Ciência Florestal, 28(4), 1651-1665. doi.org/10.5902/1980509835315
Gulseven, O., Ashkanani, S., Abdullah, S., Ismaeil, H., Alkandari, H., & Baroun, M. (2019). A sustainable model for enhancing road quality with recycled plastic bags. Kuwait Journal of Science, 46(4), 112-119.
Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688–1698. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001
Kontogianni, S., & Moussiopoulos, N. (2017). Investigation of the occupational health and safety conditions in Hellenic solid waste management facilities and assessment of the in-situ hazard level. Safety Science, 96, 192–197. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.025
Kozajda, A., Jeżak, K., Cyprowski, M., & Szadkowska-Stańczyk, I. (2017). Inhalable dust, endotoxins and (1–3)-β-d-glucans as indicators of exposure in waste sorting plant environment. Aerobiologia, 33(4), 481–491. doi:10.1007/s10453-017-9484-4
Lavoie, J., & Guertin, S. (2001). Evaluation of Health and Safety Risks in Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Plants. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 51(3), 352–360. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464278
Neitzel, R. L., Crollard, A., Dominguez, C., Stover, B., & Seixas, N. S. (2013). A mixed-methods evaluation of health and safety hazards at a scrap metal recycling facility. Safety Science, 51(1), 432–440. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.012
Oliveira, O. J. D., Oliveira, A. B. D., & Almeida, R. A. D. (2010). Gestão da segurança e saúde no trabalho em empresas produtoras de baterias automotivas: um estudo para identificar boas práticas. Revista Produção, 20(3), p. 481-490.
Pie, A. C. S., Fernandes, R. C. P., Carvalho, F. M., & Porto, L. A. (2020). Presenteeism and associated factors in industry workers. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 45(13). Epub April 03. doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369000003118
Poole, C. J. M., & Basu, S. (2017). Systematic Review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector. Occupational Medicine, 67(8), 626–636. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqx153
Schlosser, O., Déportes, I. Z., Facon, B., & Fromont, E. (2015). Extension of the sorting instructions for household plastic packaging and changes in exposure to bioaerosols at materials recovery facilities. Waste Management, 46, 47–55. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.022
Schlosser, O., Robert, S., & Noyon, N. (2020). Airborne mycotoxins in waste recycling and recovery facilities: Occupational exposure and health risk assessment. Waste Management, 105, 395–404. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.031
Shafei, A., Hodges, J., & Mayer, S. (2018). Ensuring Workplace Safety in Goal-based Industrial Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 137, p. 90–101. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.009
Soto, J. M., Blázquez, G., Calero, M., Quesada, L., Godoy, V., & Martín-Lara, M. Á. (2018). A real case study of mechanical recycling as an alternative for managing of polyethylene plastic film presented in mixed municipal solid waste. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.302
UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme. World Environment Day 2018: Overviewhttps://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25398/WED%20Messaging%20Two-Page%2027April.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y