A method to solve two-player zero-sum matrix games in chaotic environment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article proposes a method for solving the two-player zero-sum matrix games in chaotic environment. In a fast growing world, the real life situations are characterized by their chaotic behaviors and chaotic processes. The chaos variables are defined to study such type of problems. Classical mathematics deals with the numbers as static and less value-added, while the chaos mathematics deals with it as dynamic evolutionary, and comparatively more value-added. In this research article, the payoff is characterized by chaos numbers. While the chaos payoff matrix converted into the corresponding static payoff matrix. An approach for determining the chaotic optimal strategy is developed. In the last, one solved example is provided to explain the utility, effectiveness and applicability of the approach for the problem.
Abbreviations: DM= Decision Maker; MCDM = Multiple Criteria Decision Making; LPP = Linear Programming Problem; GAMS= General Algebraic Modeling System.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access
Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:
a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.
References
Bandyopadhyay, S., Nayak, P. K., & Pal, M. (2013) Solution of matrix game with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy pay-off using score function. Open Journal of Optimization, 2(1), 9-15. DOI: 10.4236/ojop.2013.21002
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Nayak, P. K. (2013) Matrix games with trapezoidal fuzzy payoff. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 5, 21- 29.
Bector, C. R., & Chandra, S., Vijay, (2004) Duality in linear programming with fuzzy parameters and matrix games with fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 146, 253-269. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(03)00260-4
Bector, C. R., & Chandra, S., Vijay, (2004a) Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy linear programming duality. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(3), 255-269. DOI: 10.1023/B:FODM.0000036866.18909.f1
Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970) Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141-164. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
Berg, J., & Engel, A. (1998) Matrix games, mixed strategies, and statistical mechanics. Physical Review Letters, 81(22), 4999-5002. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4999
Bhuiyan, B. A. (2018) An overview of game theory and some applications. Philosophy and Progress, 59(1-2), 111-128. DOI: 10.3329/pp.v59i1-2.36683
Campos, L. (1989) Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 32(3), 275-289. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90260-1
Camona, G., & Carvalho, L. (2016) Repeated two-person zero-sum games with unequal discounting and private monitoring. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 63(C), 131-138. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406816000136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.02.005
Chen, Y- W., & Larboni, M. (2006) Two-person zero-sum game approach for fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(1), 34-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.06.004
Deng, X., Jiang, W., & Zhang, J. (2017) Zero-sum matrix game with payoffs of Dempster- Shafer belief structures and its applications on sensors. Sensors, 17(4), 922. DOI: 10.3390/s17040922.
Dhingra, A. K., & Rao, S. S. (1995) A cooperative fuzzy game theoretic approach to multiple objective design optimizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 83(3, p. 547-567. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0324-Q
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980) Possibility Theory: An approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, Plenum, New York.
Gutzwiller, M. C. (1991) Chaos in classical and quantum mechanics. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY.
Ketata, C., Satish, M. G., & Islam, M. R. (2006) Chaos numbers. In: International Conference On Computational Intelligence For Modeling Control And Automation (CIMCA), IEEE, Proceedings, Sydney, Australia. DOI: 10.1109/CIMCA.2006.132
Khalifa, H. A. (2019) An approach for solving two- person zero- sum matrix games in neutrosophic environment. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 12(2), 186-198. Available: http://www.jise.ir/article_87288.html
Krishnaveni, G., & Ganesan, K. (2018) New approach for the solution of two person zero sum fuzzy games. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(9), 405-414. Available: https://acadpubl.eu/jsi/2018-119-9/articles/9/39.pdf
Kumar, S., Chopra, R., & Saxena, R. R. (2016) A fast approach to solve matrix games with payoffs of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 33(06), 1650047. DOI: 10.1142/S0217595916500470
Li, F. D., & Hong, X. F. (2012) Solving constrained matrix games with payoffs of triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 64(4), 432-448. DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.009
Liu, B. (2002) Theory and practice of uncertain programming, Physica, New York, NY, USA.
Luce, R., & Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and decision, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Nan, R., Li, D. F., & Zhang, M. J. (2010) A Lexicographic method for matrix games with payoffs of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(3), 280-289. DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2010.9727699
Pandey, D., & Kumar, S. (2010) Modified approach to multiobjective matrix game with vague payoffs. Journal of International Academy of Physical of Sciences, 14(2), 149-157.
Parthasarathy, T., & Raghavan, E. T. (2010) Some topics in two-person games. American Elsevier Publishing, NEW York, NY, USA, 1971.
Peitgen, H- O., Jurgens, H., & Saupe, D. (2004) Chaos and fractals, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York, NY.
Peski, M. (2008) Comparison of information structures in zero- sum games. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2), 732-735. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.004. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0899825607001169.
Sahoo, L. (2015) An interval parametric technique for solving fuzzy matrix games. Elixir Applied Mathematics, 93, 39392-39397. Available: https://www.elixirpublishers.com
SAHOO, L. (2017) An approach for solving fuzzy matrix games using signed distance method. Journal of Information and Computing Science, 12(1), 073-080. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/149a/eddfb9fd64ebf522fd424c404071d41c49ec.pdf
Sakawa, M., & Nishizaki, I. (1994) Max-min solutions for fuzzy multiobjective matrix games. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67(1), 53-69. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90208-9. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0165011494902089.
Seikh, M. R., Nayak, K. P., & Pal, M. (2013) An alternative approach for solving fuzzy matrix games. International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing, 5(1), 79-92.
Selvakumari, K., & Lavanya, S. (2015) An approach for solving fuzzy game problem. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(15), 1-6. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i15/56807
Strogatz, S. H. (2001) Nonlinear dynamic and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering, Preseus Books Group, New York, NY.
Takahashi, S. (2008) The number of pure nash equilibria in a random game with nondecreasing best responses. Games and Economic Behavior, 63(1), 328-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2007.10.003
Thirucheran, M., Meena, R. E., & Lavanya, S. (2017) A new approach for solving fuzzy game problem. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 114(6), 67-75. Available: https://acadpubl.eu/jsi/2017-114-5/articles/2/8.pdf
Vijay, V., Chandra, S., & Bector, C. R. (2005) Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs. Omega, 33(5), 425-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.007
Vijay, V., Mehra, A., Chandra, S., & Bector, C. R. (2007) Fuzzy matrix games via a fuzzy relation approach. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 6, 299-314. DOI: 10.1007/s10700-007-9015-9
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, D. (1944) The theory of games in economic behavior, Wiley, New York.
Xu, J. (1998) Zero sum two-person game with grey number payoff matrix in linear programming. The Journal of Grey System, 10(3), 225-233. DOI:
Xu, J., & Yao, L. (2010) A class of two-person zero-sum matrix games with rough payoffs. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 22. DOI: 10.1155/2010/404792
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8(3), 338- 353.
Zhao, R., Govind, R., & Fan, G. (1992) The complete decision set of the generalized symmetrical fuzzy linear programming problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 51(1), 53-65. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(92)90075-F