Delineation of the corporate
use of Environmental Information Systems (EIS):
Selected cases of the Corporate
Organizations in
Felichesmi Selestine Lyakurwa
E-mail:
lyakurwa@mail.dlut.edu.cn
Michael Shadrack Mangula
E-mail: mangulaj@gmail.com
Submission:
20/05/2013
Revision: 31/05/2013
Accept: 05/08/2013
ABSTRACT
Environmental
information systems are essential platforms for the provision of adequate and
relevant information necessary for the planning and decision making for greener
production. Corporate use of environmental information systems gained several
benefits in the global and local markets. Nevertheless, there was no
documentation to explain the extent to which corporate organizations utilize
available environmental information systems in
The
study identified various corporate environmental management functions performed
at all levels of the corporate organization, in which workers spends less than
one hour on the environmental information systems available. The results also
revealed that, there is adequate utilization of available environmental
information systems for
environmental management. Therefore, the research outcomes provides
inputs to corporate organization unit managers, corporate owners and other
environmental stakeholders on the extent of the systems’ use as well as sharing
experience on different environmental management systems used worldwide.
Keywords: Environmental Information System, corporate organization,
1.
INTRODUCTION
In
recent years, applicability of Environmental Information Systems (EIS) for corporate environmental
management is a global issue of environmental concern due to the environmental
fate resulted from the industrial production processes. Several studies to
mention a few have reported existence of harmful substances in the food, raw
materials, industrial and municipal wastes, and in the cause of production
processes (UNEP 2012, SCHWARZMAN; WILSON,
2009). Corporate organizations are the main polluter of the environment
in which greener production is practiced via implementation of various
environmental information systems including the agent-based intelligent
environmental monitoring system (ATHANASIADIS; MITKAS, 2004), life cycle
assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis (MYLLYVIITA et al. 2012),
fisher information (EASON; CABEZAS, 2012), geographical information systems
(MOHAN 2001; ESRI, 2011) as well as traditional documentation of wastes
(HEBERLING; HOPTON, 2012) or hazardous materials collected on daily basis.
Moreover, Environmental Information Systems (EIS)
are the important information platform for providing adequate and relevant
environmental information to the corporate decision makers and planners (Oyama
et al., 2008 and Mohamed, 2009) as well as getting updates on newly developed
hazardous substances.
The term information can be
ambiguous and lead to misunderstanding (BRITAN, 1970). In attempt to describe
the philosophy of information florid (2004) argued that information is still an
elusive concept, it is hardest and most central in philosophy of information.
The aarhus convection (MOHAMED, 2009; CARLSON; PALSSON, 2001) environmental
information can be defined as any information be it written, virtual, aural
(audio), electronic or any other material form concerning with; (1) the state
of environment including air and atmosphere, water soil, land landscape and
natural sites, (2) factors including substances, energy, noise, radiation or
waste such as radioactive wastes, emissions, discharges and other releases to
the environment affecting the elements of the environment, (3) measures among
others to include policies, plans, legislation and environmental agreements,
and (4) cost benefits analysis and social-economic analyses.
To date, utilization of EIS by corporate environmental management is currently increasing worldwide
resulted from the tremendous population increase and the global climatic change
(XU et al. 2012). In which flow of information within and
between corporate organizations is vitally important for continuous
environmental improvements. The social, economic and environmental success of
organizations are achieved by presence of schematic flow of environmental information within the
strategic, tactical and control levels of the corporate organizations (JOHNSON,
2001; LYAKURWA; 2013). Through which corporate organizations will
have access to recent developments and invention of new products and means to
practice cleaner production strategies. The government of Tanzania as other
countries of the world pays great efforts to ensure higher environmental
performances of production industries are achieved; in which various
environmental management laws and regulations were developed. Among other regulations include the environmental
management act of 2004, which give all citizens the right of access to
environmental information (URT, 2004). With the use of Environmental Information Systems (EIS), greener production and sustainable development of the
countries in the world is possible, despite of the benefits, yet no study
conducted in
2.
METHODOLOGY
The extent to which corporate
organizations utilizes available Environmental Information Systems (EIS) in
The survey involved purposive
sampling with informants being experts working at various environmental
management strategic, tactical and control levels. Analysis of the collected
data was done with computer software excel and statistical package for social
sciences (SPSS). The target population for this study comprised of workers
working at the strategic, tactical and control levels of corporate
environmental management. In the corporate self-administered questionnaires
were distributed to at least two (2) workers working at each of the corporate
environmental management levels strategic, tactical and control. Out of 130
questionnaires distributed to various corporate organizations only 71
questionnaires were filled in and used for the analysis. That is, the response
rate was 54.6%.
3.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The study revealed that corporate
organization workers spend less than one hour on the available Environmental Information
Systems (EIS) including paper based, web based, geographical information system
and library environmental information systems in Tanzania.
3.1 Utilization of EIS
for strategic reasons
The results revealed inadequate of
available EIS for the strategic environmental management functions. The extent
of use is presented in table 1.
The research results (table 1),
showed that the extent to which respondents uses existing environmental
information system for the strategic reasons is relatively low (mean scores
slightly above threshold limit of 3.0). The results further depicted that the
extent of using environmental information system is low in approving and
development of environmental information systems, formulating of environmental
policy as well as in approving the environmental objectives and targets.
Table 1
utilization of EIS for strategic
reasons
Function (strategic) |
Level of
participation |
N |
Mean score |
Std dev. |
Loading |
Rank |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||||||
Formulation of environmental policy |
8 |
8 |
24 |
24 |
17 |
71 |
3.2 |
1.13 |
0.775 |
1 |
Approval of environmental
objectives and targets |
8 |
7 |
28 |
18 |
9 |
70 |
3.2 |
1.15 |
0.706 |
1 |
Develop
strategic environmental plans |
8 |
8 |
22 |
24 |
9 |
71 |
3.3 |
1.17 |
0.813 |
2 |
Approve guidelines for
integration of environmental factors |
7 |
14 |
23 |
21 |
6 |
71 |
3.1 |
1.11 |
0.796 |
3 |
Approve development of eis |
12 |
26 |
14 |
14 |
5 |
71 |
2.6 |
1.19 |
0.822 |
4 |
Grand mean |
3.08 |
|
||||||||
Five point likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = very low, 3 = low, 4 =
to some extent, 5 = to great extent |
N* is number of workers, std dev* is standard
deviation, loading* is the loading factors, r* rank
3.2 Utilization of EIS
for the tactical reasons
The adequate use of Environmental Information
Systems (EIS) for tactical reasons was observed. The detailed description is as
shown in table 2 below.
Table 2.
Utilization of EIS for the tactical
reasons
Function (tactical ) |
Level of participation |
N |
Mean score |
Std dev. |
Loading |
Rank |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||||||
Implementation environmental policy |
1 |
3 |
19 |
33 |
15 |
71 |
3.8 |
0.87 |
0.637 |
1 |
Implementation environmental objectives target |
0 |
8 |
19 |
27 |
17 |
71 |
3.7 |
0.95 |
0.624 |
2 |
Implementation environmental programmes |
2 |
2 |
25 |
23 |
19 |
71 |
3.8 |
0.97 |
0.698 |
1 |
Integration environmental Factors |
3 |
10 |
16 |
23 |
19 |
71 |
3.6 |
1.15 |
0.740 |
3 |
Operationalizations of
environmental information systems |
10 |
16 |
20 |
12 |
13 |
71 |
3.0 |
1.31 |
0.775 |
4 |
Grand mean |
3.58 |
|
||||||||
Five point likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = very low, 3 = low, 4 =
to some extent, 5 = to great extent |
n* is number
of workers, std dev* is standard deviation, loading* is the loading factors, r*
rank
The research results (table 2) shows
that, the extent to which corporate workers use available environmental
information system for tactical reasons is adequate with the grand mean score
slightly above threshold limit of 3.0.
3.3 Utilization of EIS
for the control reasons
The extent to which corporate
organization uses eis for the control reasons is relatively adequate. Table 3
describes the control functions performed and the extent of EIS use for the
environmental management purposes.
Table 3.
Utilization of EIS for the control
reasons
Function (control) |
Level of participation |
N |
Mean score |
Std dev. |
Loading |
Rank |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||||||
Monitoring of operations
to comply environmental policy |
2 |
5 |
9 |
34 |
20 |
70 |
3.9 |
0.98 |
0.688 |
1 |
Auditing and evaluation of
objectives and targets appraisal |
5 |
7 |
27 |
19 |
12 |
70 |
3.4 |
1.11 |
0.739 |
3 |
Supervise and review
implementation of environmental plans |
4 |
13 |
20 |
23 |
10 |
70 |
3.3 |
1.11 |
0.802 |
4 |
Supervise integration of
environmental factors product designs |
3 |
9 |
15 |
30 |
13 |
70 |
3.6 |
1.07 |
0.797 |
2 |
Supervise production of
environmental reports, documentation |
13 |
14 |
19 |
13 |
11 |
70 |
2.9 |
1.33 |
0.753 |
5 |
Grand mean |
3.42 |
|
||||||||
Five point likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = very low, 3 = low, 4 =
to some extent, 5 = to great extent |
N*
is number of workers, std dev* is standard deviation, loading* is the loading
factors, r* rank
The results (table 3) revealed that,
the extent to which respondents’ uses existing EIS for the control reasons is
adequate (grand mean slightly above threshold limit of 3.0). The extent to
which respondents uses existing EIS for auditing and evaluation of
environmental objectives and targets appraisal, supervise and review
implementation of environmental management plans and programmes, supervise
integration of environmental factors into product and process designs and
monitoring of corporate operations to comply with the environmental policy is
low (the mean scores are slightly above the threshold limit of 3.0). While, the
extent to which respondents use EIS for the supervision on production of
environmental reports, documentation and communication to employees and public
is very low (mean score below threshold limit of 3).
The chi-square test was also
performed. In which the chi - square values for the variables were computed
using spss software version 17. The chi-square test showed that all variables
that measure frequency of using EIS for strategic, tactical and control reasons
are significantly associated at 0.01, except for operationalization of EIS (prob.
0.369) and supervise production of environmental reports, documentation and
communication to employees and public (prob. 0.632). This signifies lack of
proper documentation of environmental issues within and between corporate
organizations in
The ANOVA tests on extent of
respondents’ use of EIS for the corporate environmental management for tactical
reasons were also performed. The extent of use was examined through respondents
working section with factor of manufacturing, service and beverage processing
tested at 0.01 and 0.05 confidence levels. The analysis showed significance
differences for the majority of the strategic, tactical and control functions
except on the formulation of environmental policy (prob. 0.403), approval of
guidelines for integration of environmental factors into product designs (prob.
0.200) and monitoring of corporate operations to comply with the environmental
policy (prob. 0.104). These results are the indication that, little emphasis is
given on consideration of environmental issues at corporate level.
4.
conclusion
The extent to which corporate
environmental management functions utilize available environmental information
systems in
5.
REferences
ATHANASIADIS,
A. I.; MITKAS, A. P., (2004) An agent-based intelligent environmental
monitoring system. In management of
environmental quality, an international
journal, v. 15, n. 3, p. 238-249.
BABBIE,
E. (1992), The practice of social research, 6th edition,
CARLSON,
R. AND PALSSON, C. (2001), Industrial environmental information management for
technical systems, journal of cleaner
production, centre for environmental assessment of product and material
systems, chalmers university of technology, 412 96 goteborg, sweden.
EASON,
T.; CABEZAS, H. (2012) Evaluating the sustainability of a regional system using
fisher information in the san luis basin,
ESRI
(2011) Geographic information systems
and environmental health: incorporating esri technology and services. An
esri white paper.
FLORIDI,
L (2004), open problems in the philosophy of information, journal of metaphilosophy, v. 35, n.4, p. 554-582.
HEBERLING,
T. M.; HOPTON, E. M. (2012) Introduction to the special collection of papers on
the san luis basin sustainability metrics project: a methodology for evaluating
regional sustainability. Journal of
environmental management, n. 111, p.
272-278.
JOHNSON,
G.; SCHOLES, K. (1993) Exploring
corporate strategy: text and cases, prentice-hall, hemel mempstead.
LYAKURWA,
S. F. (2013) applicability of industrial ecology strategies for the corporate
environmental management: selected cases of the eastern and northern zones of
MOHAN,
M. (2001) Geographical information system for monitoring environmental change
and restoration of ecological sustainable development over
MYLLYVIITA,
T.; HOLMA, A.; ANTIKAINEN, R.; LÄHTINEN, K.; LESKINEN, P. (2012) Assessing
environmental impacts of biomass production chains application of life cycle
assessment (lca) and multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda). Journal of cleaner production, v. 29-30, p. 238-245.
OYAMA N; AKINO H; KANAMARU H. (2008), Resources
processing evaluating public availability of environmental information: an
indicator based assessment,
SCHWARZMAN,
R. M.; WILSON, P. M. (2009) New science for chemicals policy. Science, n. 326, p. 1065-1066).
UNEP
(2012) Global chemical outlook: towards
sound management of chemicals: synthesis report to decision makers. Unep,
pp. 9-43.
URT (2004)
XU,
M.; WEISSBURG, M.; NEWELL, P. J.; CRITTENDEN, C. J. (2012) developing science
of infrastructure ecology for sustainable urban systems. Environ. Sci. Technol.,
n. 46, p. 7928-7929.