Editorial Introduction
This issue of the Independent
Journal of Management & production (IJM&P) features a
selection of articles submitted and revised until February 2020. Observe the
works are the fruit of research and publications of undergraduate, postgraduate
and entrepreneurs.
It is
important to mention that all the works are showed without any kind of payment.
All of them are published free from payments or taxes.
The publication also
counts on the work of researchers from various parts of the world, which have
undergone a process of peer review.
As chief editor of IJM&P,
I am indebted to all members of the editorial board and reviewers, which
contributed to achieve a very decent job during the evaluation and revision.
Moreover, that they have contributed to the Journal in recognition of the
international scientific community.
In
addition, with all the authors, who trusted the results of their research and
publications to the scrutiny of editors and reviewers who are part of our
Journal.
On
July 20, 2018, the journal was notified via E-mail of its indexing and
abstracted in: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Clarivate
Analytics - Web of Science - Thompson Reuters. With the availability of
journal data on August 20, 2018.
The Table 1 presents
how our collaborators, by their categories of study and sex are.
Table 1:
Distribution of users by degree
|
|
Dr. Ph.D. |
MSc. |
Dr./Ph.D.
Student |
MSc. Student |
Specia- list |
Profes-sors |
Stu-dents |
Others |
Total |
|
Male |
1,121 |
277 |
257 |
60 |
36 |
29 |
69 |
113 |
1,962 |
|
Female |
421 |
119 |
136 |
20 |
13 |
2 |
53 |
30 |
794 |
From
the data provided in Table 1 on the distribution users by titration, Figure 1
shows the percentage of each titration.
Figure 1: Distribution chart for degree
The Table 2 shows the
preview data and journal access, since its creation in 2010.
Table 2: views by volume/number
|
Year |
Country |
Cities |
Access |
Users |
Viewers |
|
2010 |
25 |
75 |
340 |
181 |
5,474 |
|
2011 |
75 |
343 |
1,510 |
1,024 |
12,942 |
|
2012 |
83 |
444 |
2,187 |
1,406 |
15,499 |
|
2013 |
118 |
1,208 |
11,946 |
6,006 |
71,264 |
|
2014 |
146 |
1,978 |
17,440 |
10,503 |
68,340 |
|
2015 |
147 |
2,307 |
23,017 |
14,460 |
96,735 |
|
2016 |
162 |
2,911 |
26,654 |
17,847 |
112,928 |
|
2017 |
184 |
4,078 |
37,171 |
27,129 |
109,535 |
|
2018 |
190 |
5,220 |
57,157 |
44,400 |
187,729 |
|
2019 |
194 |
4,750 |
55,825 |
42,873 |
158,101 |
|
2020 |
165 |
2,166 |
16,278 |
12,377 |
60,774 |
In the period from January, 01 to March, 31 2020,
the journal was accessed by approximately 106,990 users, of approximately 3,773
cities and 184 countries, in the Figure 2 is presented the map mundi, in which
can be observed the countries of where was originating the access (GOOGLE, 2020).
Figure 2: Countries that have accessed the journal
In Figures 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 is shown a
graph of the amount of hits that
the journal received between
January 1, 2014 and Mach 31, 2020; these data are based on
information provided by the Google
analytics.
Figure 3: amount of hits between 2014 and 2020
The
Figure 4 shows the comparison of the number of cities, around the world, that
have accessed the journal.
Figure 4: Amount of cities between
2014 and 2020
The
Figure 5 shows the averages of views on the journal in the period between the
years of 2014 and 2020.
Figure 5: Amount of average between
2014 and 2020
The
Figure 6 shows the comparison of the number of countries, around the world,
that have accessed the journal.
Figure 6: Amount of countries between 2014 and
2020
The
Figure 7 shows the comparison of the number of users, around the world, that
have accessed the journal.
Figure 7: Amount of users between 2014
and 2020
The
Figure 8 shows the comparison of the number of viewers, around the world, that
have accessed the journal.
Figure 8: Amount of Viewers between 2013 and 2020
Figure 9 shows the overall evolution
accumulated in the 12 months, as well as the visualizations between the years
of 2013 and 2020 and that can be compared with Figure 8.
Figure 9: Global evolution of views between 2013 and 2020
Figure 10 shows the evolutionary
chart of resolutions address the articles registered in Crossref
since 2014, which is based on monthly report. This graph can be seen the
evolution of the journal has achieved.
Figure 10: Resolution Report for prefix 10.14807 from between 2014
and 2020
We appreciate the intense
participation of all colleagues, which has made our journal become a place of
wide dissemination of knowledge.
The following content will be
presented with the titles, authors and the pages of all of the articles
published in this edition issue.
EDITORIAL
VOLUME 11, ISSUE 2 (548-555)
Paulo Cesar Chagas Rodrigues
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.749
AN
ALGORITHM TO SOLVE THE INVERSE KINEMATICS TO A STEWART PLATFORM (263-282)
Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu, Relly Victoria Virgil
Petrescu
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.788
INFORMAL
WORK: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION OF THE LAST 10 YEARS IN BRAZIL (283-303)
Yohans De Oliveira Esteves, Ione Vasques-Menezes
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1022
MULTI-ITEM
A SUPPLY CHAIN PRODUCTION INVENTORY MODEL OF TIME DEPENDENT PRODUCTION RATE AND
DEMAND RATE UNDER SPACE CONSTRAINT IN FUZZY ENVIRONMENT (304-323)
Satya Kumar Das, Sahidul Islam
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1037
A
DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF BRAND EQUITY OF INDIA'S POPULAR ONLINE SHOPPING SITES (324-342)
Ashutosh Anil Sandhe
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1066
CRITICAL
SUCCESS FACTORS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW AND
ANALYSIS (343-359)
Tulio Cremonini Entringer, Lívia Lacopo da Silva
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1050
ANALYSIS
OF CUSTOMERS' RESPONSE TO STORE ATMOSPHERICS STIMULUS: THE VOLUME OF MUSIC (360-379)
Rafika Benguirat, Sugandha Agarwal, Azza Frikha
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.895
COMMUNITIES
OF PRACTICE AND QFD METHOD FOR GREEN LOGISTICS IN THE COSMETICS INDUSTRY: A
SUGGESTED REVIEW (380-393)
Neusa Maria Andrade, Jair Gustavo de Mello Torres, Irapuan
Glória Júnior, Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1041
A
REFERENCE MODEL IN BPMN FOR CONCEPTUAL MODELLING OF MASTER PLANNING SCHEDULE (394-418)
Tulio Cremonini Entringer, Ailton da Silva Ferreira
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1067
EFFECTIVENESS
OF ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION OF THE PUBLIC SECURITY SECRETARIES OF THE BRAZILIAN
STATES (419-437)
Elielton de Amorim Coelho, Platini Gomes Fonseca, Emmanuelle
Fonseca Marinho de Anias Daltro
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1047
THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND EQUITY AND INTENTION TO BUY: THE CASE OF CONVENIENCE
STORES (434-449)
Phuong Viet Le-Hoang, Giang Truong Nguyen, Huong
Thanh Thi Phung, Vi Truc Ho
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1062
THE
EFFECT OF MARKETING MIX AND BRAND IMAGE ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY OF REMIXED MORTAR (450-472)
Megawati Simanjuntak, Ujang Sumarwan, Ariel Diesto
Situmorang
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.963
ANALYSIS
OF THE MOVEMENTS OF CABOTAGE PORT FACILITIES AND A LONG-TERM COURSE BETWEEN THE
PERIOD FROM 2015 TO 2017 USING THE LINEAR REGRESSION METHOD (473-485)
Luiz Rodrigo Bonette, Dayane Melo Pavan, Larissa
Freitas Silva
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.966
SOME
DYNAMIC MODELS OF RIGID MEMORY MECHANISMS (486-518)
Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu, Relly Victoria Virgil
Petrescu
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.929
THE
MEASUREMENT PROCESS IN MICRO AND SMALL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE COMPANIES:
EMPIRICAL STUDY (519-537)
Victor José Aguiar Teixeira de Melo Fran, Gislaine
Camila Lapasini Leal, Renato Balancieri, Ana Cristina Rouiller
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1028
SCREW
TORQUE TRACEABILITY CONTROL: INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION (538-547)
Carlos Americo de Souza Silva, Iracyanne Retto
Uhlmann, Enzo Morosini Frazzon
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1038
April 1, 2020
Prof. Dr. Paulo Cesar Chagas
Rodrigues
Editor in Chief