Ines
Jemmali
ENICarthage, University of Carthage, Tunisia
E-mail: jammeli.ines@gmail.com
Mohamed
Najeh Lakhoua
ENICarthage, University of Carthage, Tunisia
E-mail: MohamedNajeh.Lakhoua@ enicarthage.rnu.tn
Imed
Jabri
ENSIT,
University of Tunis, Tunisia
E-mail:
imedjabri@yahoo.com
Mnaouer
Djemali
INAT, University of
Carthage, Tunisia
E-mail:
mdjemali@webmails.com
Mohamed
Annabi
ENSIT,
University of Tunis, Tunisia
E-mail:
moh_annabi@yahoo.com
Submission: 5/29/2020
Accept: 7/3/2020
ABSTRACT
The paper deals with the identification of the
behavioral criteria of dairy cattle through Imaging. The objective of the study
is the optimization of the rate of pregnancy in these cows. Indeed, the
gestural behaviors of 200 cows belonging to a stable were observed by giving
more attention to cows that show signs of heat known. A camera was used to
record the different postures and the different behaviors of these cows. The
quantitative data of reproduction studied farm showed that the rate of
pregnancy in these cows is far from optimal. This is due essentially to a lack
of monitoring and observation of cows in heat negatively affecting the
economics of the operation. Detecting cows in heat can be made and improved by
using Imaging. This will facilitate the life of farmers and increase their
income and decreasing the time for detection of the heat.
Keywords: Imagery; system analysis;
heat; cattle; behavioral criteria; management
1.
INTRODUCTION
Various studies and reflections on
the development of the agricultural sector have stressed the importance of
upgrading of farms. Exploitation of automated production systems is a reality
especially in the cattle breeders structured at the level of the Treaty and
complementation food rooms, the use of ICT remains shy in Tunisia.
Indeed, with the expansion of herds
and the desire to improve offspring, cows are more covered by bulls but are
artificially inseminated after their observation in heat (Bouraoui
et al., 2002; Lakhoua & Karoui, 2019).
The
production of milk and meat of a milk cow is directly related to their
reproductive function. It is the birth of the newborn that triggers the
production of milk in this animal. This birth called calving is direct function
of the success of the artificial insemination following accurate detection of
the reentry period in heat of the cow in question.
However the heat at farms size
detection is often provided by workers and therefore prone to errors of
observation. It is the result of a multitude of factors related to the accuracy
of the observation of the signs of heat, to the effectiveness of artificial
insemination as well as the fertility of the seed. To have a calving every 12
months, 90% of the cows must go into heat within 60 days after their calving.
The interval between calving and fertilising
insemination must be on average between 50 and 60 days.
Milk
production plays a key role in the agricultural sector and in the Tunisian
economy (Hammami, 2004). Since the 1990s, the State
encourages investment in the breeding of dairy cows to meet the growing demand
for milk and its derivatives. This encouragement enabled Tunisia to achieve
self-sufficiency in milk since 1999.
Although
the number of livestock has increased significantly and that the existing races
in Tunisia, through import, can have very high yields, we're still far from the
optimal production rate. This is due mainly to a low detection rate of cows in
heat (Djemali & Kayouli, 2003; Hamrouni & Djemali,
2017).
Farming occupies, in Tunisia, the
most important agricultural production part. It represents between 32% and 37%
of the value of agricultural production with 769 thousand cattle heads, 7
million sheep, 1.5 million goats and 70 thousand units females of camelids.
The livestock sector plays an
important socio-economic role. He contributed 22% of permanent positions in
agricultural activities. It affects a total of 112 000 cattle producers, 274
000 herders of sheep and 2300 breeders of camels in addition to farms poultry
and rabbits (OEP, 2015).
Three classes of farmers are met,
small (75%), the means and the ranchers. The latter (20%) are often advanced in
the application of modern breeding methods (parlours,
cold to the farm, Artificial Insemination and improved Genetics). As for the
dairy cattle industry, it includes a total of 235 milk collection centers and
dairy processing units, 43.
Meat
production is considered as a by-product of milk and helps to supply a total of
183 slaughterhouses and 20 units of cuts of red meat. It has a tendency to
increase in cows of pure breed at the expense of local and cross cows. In 2010,
the purebred cows represented 51%. In 2015, they accounted for 65 percent. The
dairy cow in Tunisia has become more specialized (El Ghezal,
2012).
In
developed countries, several technological attempts have been adopted to help
farmers better manage dairy cattle herds based in particular on the use of
pedometers. In Tunisia, the breeding of dairy cows continues to pose problems
due mainly to a bad heat detection and insemination time opportune (50, 60 days
after calving). This has led to calving intervals exceeding 14 months (Salem et
al., 2006; Lakhoua et al.
2019).
It
is in this context that this work was proposed to identify the criteria of
behavior of dairy cattle in a barn through the application of systemic analysis
(Lakhoua, 2018, Lakhoua et
al., 2016, Lakhoua, 2013) and electronic imaging (Ben
Mansour et al., 2015, Cheikhrouhou et al., 2015, Soltani et al. 2018).
2.
MATERAL AND METHODS
The economy of a cattle farm is
based primarily on reproduction. The latter increases the production of beef as
well as milk because a cow can only give milk after having calved at least once
in her life. The first concern of all cattle producers is therefore to increase
the breeding rate to increase their income. The traditional or rather natural
way to have gestant cows is to protrude them from a
bull. However, modern bovine barns no longer use this method and use
genetically high animal seed using Artificial Insemination (Hamrouni
et al., 2009).
Wanting to improve the offspring
i.e. the dairy performance of girls or heifers, breeders import the seed of
good bulls so that newborns have better genes than their parents and therefore
produce more milk. In addition to the genetic side, the bull can pose a danger
to breeders because of its ongoing agitation. It is for these reasons that
modern reasons that modern breeders opt for artificial insemination and quality
animal seed. However, to practice this method properly, the ovulation periods
of each cow must be known precisely in order to be able to be inseminated and
produce one calf per year.
Ovulation is a physiological phase
of the female where the egg is ripe to be fertilized by the male's animal seed.
This physiological stage is expressed by what is called the cow's "heat
period." This is a cyclical period that appears on average every 21 days
if fertilization of the egg has not taken place. Fortunately for breeders, a
cow has several signs that indicate its entry into heat.
Indeed, a cow in heat climbs on its
congener or let’s itself rises by the latter without slipping away (Figure 1).
This often leaves traces observable with the naked eye on the back of the
raised cow.
In this part the cattle herd of a
farm in Tunisia was presented (Jemmali, 2016). The
barn is linked to the milking room by a protected area where cows congregate
before being taken to the milking room. It is a barn where only the feeder is
protected by a shelter, the rest is an open space (Figure 2). The heifers are
separated from the cows in a second room. A new barn is currently being built.
It will allow more well-being to cows and more access and work facilities for
workers and livestock managers.
Figure 1: Acceptance of overlap
Figure 2: The current barn studied
The cows are reproduced by
Artificial Insemination using the imported seed of Bulls tested for their high
genetic level. This is what has given this farm a reputation for producing
quality heifers. Cows or heifers are inseminated as a result of heat
observation. Specialized workers detect the females in heat and pass their
number to the farm manager. Females observed in heat at night are inseminated
in the morning. Those observed during the day are inseminated in the evening by
the veterinarian.
The sign language behavior of 200
cows belonging to this farm was observed by giving more attention to cows that
show signs of known heat (Jemmali et al., 2017). A
camera was used to record the different postures and behaviors of these cows.
All
photos and video footage were used to build a database. A computer program has
been developed to translate these observations into recognizable indicators
showing that a cow is in heat (Jemmali et al.,
2017b).
The traditional but still most used
method in the world to this day is heat detection by observing the behavioral
changes of dairy cows. This method, if
not well practiced, may give false alarms or not detect heat. In addition to
the poor practice of observing cows with the naked eye, heat expression defects
are becoming more common (Djemali & Berger,
1992).
In the 1980s, the time interval
between the first and last acceptance of overlap varied between 6pm and 8pm,
whereas today this interval has narrowed considerably and varies from 4am to
8am. In other words, the duration of heat expression in a dairy cow today is a
quarter of those 30 years ago.
All the factors already mentioned
make the method of detecting heat with the naked eye not very reliable. This
does not allow breeders, in the majority of cases, to know precisely the ideal
time to inseminate the cows, which eventually leads to large economic losses.
Not being very reliable and very profitable, it was necessary to find solutions
other than the traditional method to detect the ovulation of a cow in order to
inseminate it in time.
3. RESULTS
Quantitative data on reproductive
performance were analyzed separately for heifers and adult cows. The main
results for heifers are in Table 1. Out of a total of 31 heifers, 94% (29
heifers) were conceived following the observation of the first heats as
presented in Table 2.
Table 1:
Breeding parameters for heifers
Variable |
Number |
Middle |
Minimum |
Maximum |
I12 (days) |
3 |
36 |
19 |
51 |
I23 (days) |
3 |
7 |
0 |
22 |
Age_IF (months) |
31 |
16 |
15 |
18 |
Age_ calving (months) |
31 |
25 |
24 |
27 |
Table 2: Design at the first heat observed
Variable |
Number |
% |
Design at the first
Artificial Insemination |
29 |
94 |
>= 1 heat
observed |
2 |
6 |
Total |
31 |
100 |
Only three heifers required more
than one heat cycle. This shows that heifers are well observed by workers.
Being separated from cows in independent housing with a reduced staff has made
it possible to better observe the heat of the heifers.
The
calving frequencies per year are shown in Table 3. In our database, the
majority of calvings took place in 2015 (78%).
Table 3: Calvings per year
Year of calving |
Number of cows |
% |
2014 |
17 |
8 |
2015 |
159 |
78 |
2016 |
28 |
14 |
The frequencies of calving per month
are shown in Table 4. There are more calvings in
autumn and early winter than in summer.
Table 4: Calvings per month
Month of
calving |
Number of
calvings |
% |
1 |
23 |
11 |
2 |
24 |
12 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
12 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
6 |
9 |
32 |
16 |
10 |
27 |
13 |
11 |
20 |
9 |
12 |
24 |
12 |
4. DISCUSSION
The
results represent a sign of good conduct of Holstein dairy cattle in the
climatic conditions of Tunisia when there are more calvings
in the most favorable seasons. Three main seasons affecting the milk production
of Holstein cows have been identified.
Cows
that calve in Autumn- early winter give more milk during their total annual
lactation followed by cows calving in the spring. Cows that calve in the summer
produce less. The explanation that was put forward was that cows calving in
autumn-early winter would see their entire lactation take place in a favorable
period.
Cows
that calve in the spring have a good start in the spring but will be penalized
by the summer heat in full lactation. As for cows that calve in the summer,
they are penalized from the start by the summer heat.
In
this section, we present indicators of the effectiveness of heat observations.
Indeed, the intervals between the different heats observed show the
difficulties in controlling reproduction. Averages and variations of the
various calculated variables are presented in Table 5.
Table 5:
Indicators of the reproduction
Variable |
Number of
cows |
Middle |
Norms |
I12 |
94 |
39 |
21 |
I23 |
53 |
35 |
21 |
I34 |
32 |
40 |
21 |
% Intervals (18-24 days) |
I12=17 |
I23=16 |
>85 |
IV_Ch1 |
101 |
77 |
< 40 |
IV_IA1 |
91 |
83 |
50-60 |
IV_IF |
101 |
138 |
85-100 |
It appears from these results that
reproduction is a problem at the level of this breeding. All parameters are far
removed from the standards set for proper breeding of a dairy cattle farm. This
complication stems mainly from the difficulty of observing the heat in a way
just to be able to inseminate the cow in time.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The dairy cattle sector, like any
other agricultural sector in Tunisia, can only improve if appropriate
technologies are adopted. Information processing technologies generated in
large barns and the application of imaging technologies could strengthen and
strengthen the capacity of the agricultural sector in general and in particular
the livestock sector.
This work has taken a step forward
in a vital area that is agriculture and in particular cattle farming with a
spirit of innovation. This breeding that has made our work target is both
modern is classic: modern by its new barn and its automatic distribution of
food as well as its milking room and classic in the methods of observing cows
in heat that depends on the p resistance and vigilance of workers.
The latter is often lacking revealed
by the results obtained where only 17% of the intervals between successive
heats are normal, leading to a low heat detection rate (28%). Heifers did not
pose detection problems due to their low numbers.
REFERENCES
Ben Mansour, M., Mlouhi, Y., Jabri, I.,
Battikh, T., Maalej, L., & Lakhoua , M. N. (2015). Analysis of Ophtalmic Images: Study
of Contour and Excavation Optic Nerve, European Journal of Scientific
Research. 131(3), 268-279.
Ben Salem, M., Djemali, M., Kayouli C., & Majdoub, A. (2006). A review of environmental and
management factors affecting the reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian
dairy herds in Tunisia, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18(4),
123-129.
Bouraoui, R., Lahmar,
M., & Majdoub, A. (2002). The relationship of
temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean
climate, Animal Research, 51(6), 479-491.
Cheikhrouhou, E., Jabri, I., Lakhoua, M.
N., Mlouhi, Y, Battikh, T., & Maalej L. (2015). Application of Image Processing Techniques for TV Broadcasting
of Sporting Events, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and
Applications, 6(6), 138-148.
Djemali, M., & Berger, P. J. (1992). Yield and Reroduction
Characteristics of Friesian Cattle Under North African Conditions, J. Dairy Sci, 80, 2340-2354.
Djemali, M., & Kayouli, C. (2003). L’élevage laitier en Tunisie. European
Association for Animal Production, 9, 96-105.
El Ghezal, H. (2012). Production laitière
intensive en Tunisie. INAT,
Institut National Agronomique de
Tunisie, 25p.
Hammami, H., Bedhiaf, S., & Djemali M. (2004). Simplification of
milk recording in dairy cattle for low input systems. Performance recording
of animals. State of the art, Wageningen
Academic Publishers, 209-214.
Hamrouni, A., Djemali, M.,
& Bedhiaf, S. (2009). Relations entre la longévité, la production et la reproduction des
vaches Holstein en Tunisie, Renc. Rech. Ruminants, 16.
Hamrouni, A., & Djemali, M. (2017). Study of genotype by production level interaction in
Tunisian dairy cattle, Annales
de l'INRAT 90, 160-173.
Jemmali I. (2016). Observabilité par imagerie
électronique d’une étable bovine. Projet de Fin d’Etudes, Ecole
Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Carthage, Ferme Ben Chiboub Utique / INAT.
Jemmali I., Lakhoua,
M. N., Jabri, I.,
Djemali, M., & Annabi, M. (2017a). Automatized Method to Improve Heat Detection in Large Dairy Cattle
Herds. Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science EAAP,
Tallinn, Estonia.
Jemmali I., Lakhoua, M. N., Jabri, I.,
Djemali, M., & Annabi, M. (2017b). Observability of Dairy Cattle by Electronic Imaging, Tunisia-Japan
Symposium on Science, Society and Technology TJASSST, Gammarth, Tunisia.
Lakhoua M. N.
& Karoui M. F. (2019). Monitoring of a Production
System based on Functional and Dysfunctional Analysis, Journal of Computer
Science and Control Systems, 12(1).
Lakhoua M. N. (2013). Systemic analysis of an industrial system: case study of
a grain silo, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Springer
Publishing, 38, 1243–1254.
Lakhoua M. N. (2018). The need for systemic analysis and design methodology of
medical equipments, International Journal of
Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience, 8(1),
76-88.
Lakhoua M. N., Battikh, T., & Jabri, I. (2019). Study of a
Weighing System in order to Manage a Grain Silo, Journal of Computer Science
and Control Systems, 12(2).
Lakhoua M. N., Khanchel F., Laifi, S., & Khazemi,
S., (2016). System analysis of medical equipment for healthcare
management, Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara
14(4), 17.
OEP.
(2015). Indicateurs du Secteur de
l’Elevege en Tunisie, Données Sectorielles.
Soltani, A., Battikh, T., Jabri, I., &
Lakhoua, M. N. (2018). A new expert system based
on fuzzy logic and image processing algorithms for early glaucoma diagnosis. Biomedical
Signal Processing and Control, 40, 366–377.