Yohans
De Oliveira Esteves
UNIVERSO,
Brazil
E-mail: yoesteves@gmail.com
Ione
Vasques-Menezes
UNIVERSO,
Brazil
E-mail: vasques.menezes@gmail.com
Submission: 3/22/2019
Accept: 5/17/2019
ABSTRACT
According to the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA), informal work, although prior to the 1990s, has its consolidation in the Brazilian economy as one of the side effects of the Real Plan. The objective of this study is to carry out a review of the national literature on informal work. Studies on informal work in national databases that include Brazilian scientific journals classified as A1, A2, B1 and B2 in the areas of Social Sciences, Human Sciences and Health Sciences published between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. It could be observed that the study of informal work remained constant over the years, with a total of 14 (fourteen) articles between 2008 and 2010, 13 (thirteen) articles between 2011 and 2013 and 16 (sixteen) other articles between 2014 and 2017. Regarding the methodological approach, the research shows that, in the articles analyzed, the qualitative approach, working with values, beliefs, representations, habits, attitudes and opinions, useful to understand the context in which the phenomenon occurs, was used in 74% of the studies, while the quantitative studies that seek to generate accurate and reliable measures, and measure opinions, attitudes and models capable of predicting behavior represented only 19% of the articles. The cut made for this study showed that only 43 articles, out of a total of 440 previously researched and included in the original database, consisted of studies on the relationship with work among informal workers, noting that this theme in question is underrepresented in Brazilian research work.
Keywords: Analysis; Brazil; Informal Work; Literature review
1.
INTRODUCTION
According
to Rezende and Tafner
(2005), the Institute of Applied Economic
Research-IPEA (in Portuguese), in a study published in the book Brazil: the State of a Nation,
associates the consolidation of informal work in the Brazilian economy with the
Real Plan. However, it is important to note that informality in Brazil
pre-dates the 1990s.
Noronha (2003) analyzes the economy in transition in the years
1960/1970, and points out that the exodus from the countryside to the
industrialized cities generated a large number of unemployed who, for their survival,
sought work in informality and underemployment. Nowadays, this condition of
underemployment and informality is known generically as informal work and has
become a characteristic feature of the Brazilian labor market and several other
countries. Currently, informal work, derived from technologies applied to
modern work and the economic dynamics of resection, among other aspects.
The
literature finds a plurality of concepts and definitions in relation to
informal work, without a consensual definition, which
can be understood as a form of participation in the labor market, without the
total or partial structuring of formal labor regulations, such as the signed
portfolio, social security, guarantee fund for length of service and
unemployment insurance. In some aspects, informal work can be confused with
self-employment; however, some categories of self-employed workers, such as doctors, accountants and lawyers,
have specific forms of work, with their own legislation and forms of access to
social security.
Sasaki
(2009) highlights the duality of formal and informal work as forms of work often seen as opposites. For the author, informal work can
be understood, then, as workers whose capital-labor relationship has no clear
outlines, displaced from the requirements and benefits of labor laws,
especially regarding social security.
Cacciamali (2000) points out that informal
work can be represented by street sellers, temporary work, self-employment or home office, as
a consequence of an existing demand within the
current economic and social order. For the author, this type of work is
responsible for promoting tensions and uncertainties, by providing a context of
increased competitiveness, while at the same time there is an absence of
rules or legal consensus in its regulation as a form
of work.
The concept of the informal sector given by the International Labor
Organization - ILO (1972) associates the formal/informal condition with the
existence or not of a process of subordination. Informal sector activities would
occupy market niches not filled by typically capitalist activity, since,
according to the ILO, profitability would not be enough for capitalist
operation.
According to ILO (2013), informal work is made up of poor working who
produce their goods and services without recognition, registration, regulation
or protection of their activities by public authorities. Perhaps from this
conception comes the association to precarious work and the use of the term
"fall into informality", because the informal labor force would
be composed exclusively of poor workers and without an income option.
Krein and
Proni (2010) also define informal work based on socioeconomic
changes, being that exercised without framing the social security legislation
and labor regulation. However, it is important to emphasize that the Brazilian
social security system has several forms of adhesion to the National Institute
of Social Security (INSS), allowing the inclusion of different classes of
workers in its attention mechanisms.
The worker with a signed worker's license is affiliated to the Social
Security and contributes to a general fund, self-employed workers and
entrepreneurs are individual taxpayers. In the same way, self-employed, informal workers,
students, housewives and the unemployed can make an optional contribution to
entitlement to social security benefits in
various forms (SASAKI, 2009).
Cardoso
(2013) defines informal work by its characteristics related to work itself, which involves diversity of work
arrangements, productive contexts, goods and services produced, working
conditions and relationship with state institutions. The author states that,
although the characteristics cited also apply to formal work, these often fail to meet the demands,
allowing informal activity.
The author
defends two main arguments. For him, the affirmation of the existence of
continuities between the formal and informal spaces, in which the formal
capitalist economy feeds on the circulation of goods of informality, while
informality suffers the influences coming from the formal market. As a second
argument, it points to the presence in informal environments of coordination
mechanisms supported by sociability, linked to non-economic factors and
sustained in social relationships of trust and anchored in social and family
networks.
In
addition, Cardoso (2013) proposes the construction of a concept of informality
that aggregates the existing connections between the various elements of formal
and informal work, as opposed to those that confer inferior status to
the worker that is not exclusively regulated according to the logic of state
rules and laws.
Starting
from a different conception of Cardoso (2013), Kalleberg
(2009) associates precarious work with activities in the informal sector and
temporary jobs in the formal sector, because of the contingency and
unpredictability characteristics, in which the worker is responsible for taking
on the employment risks. The absence of labor ties is pointed out as one of the
characteristics of precarious work, being directly related to the loss of labor
rights and indirect benefits already earned, such as annual paid vacation,
overtime, health plans, paid rest, transportation, food and wage losses.
Aspects
such as the way in which work is organized and the conditions in which it is
performed are factors of direct influence in the process of precariousness,
such as unattainable goals, intense pace of work, time pressure,
intensification of control and management by fear, physical, mental and
subjective weakening of workers (GIONGO;
MONTEIRO; SOBROSA, 2017). Sasaki and Vasques-Menezes
(2012) argue that this association should not be generalized, since the working
conditions inherent in the activities may prove precarious in both formal and
informal work.
Ulyssea
(2008) discusses that, in general, the studies on
informal work do not address the problem through their articulations with the
society and the economy of the country, treating it in a predominantly isolated
and sparse way. Going further, it shows that if from a strictly economic point
of view, companies perceive the onerous costs of entering the formal sector,
with the legalization and registration of the business, operational costs of
labor legislation, taxes and fees. From the same point of view, in the view of
informal workers, withholding income tax and social security contributions
represent formality costs, even though informality leads to the loss of
benefits such as social security, unemployment insurance, paid vacations and
thirteenth wages.
For Ulyssea (2008), one way to get informal
workers out of informality would be to accelerate economic growth and create
new jobs. However, according to Sasaki and Vasques-Menezes
(2012), other factors interfere in this equation and informality may not be a
direct reason for the scarcity of formal jobs, nor can the labor-labor
relationship be explained
by the mere formalization of an employment relationship.
On the other hand, Pastore
(2006) analyzes informal work from a social point of view, and reports that the
current labor legislation would have great weight for the increase of informal
work, since for its protectionist characteristic it imposes difficulties and
high cost for formal hiring. The main point to be discussed so that informal
workers can have access to formality would be the promotion of an adjustment in
this labor legislation that would allow greater flexibility, stimulating
formality.
These
authors, while discussing the existence of informal work, differ on how to
control its existence. While Ulyssea (2008) seeks
economic growth to increase formal employment, Pastore
(2006) proposes a set of laws or adaptations that allow informal workers to
migrate their businesses to a greater formality.
Several
empirical studies covering informal work are generally based on economists'
perceptions and focus on the harmful aspects of this type of work for the current
economy and for the workers themselves. Sato (2013) in addressing the gap in
psychology in studying informal work, outlines a brief historical-cultural
overview of work psychology and its focus of study over time. It emphasizes
that, only from the 1980s on, psychologists started to study work realities
less focused on meeting the demands of work and production organizations and
more interested in the daily work-labor relationship, from the perspective of
collective health and social psychology.
Sato
(2013) concludes that this effort is worthy of appreciation, since informal
work includes several ways of creating and thinking about work. Empirical
studies on informal work are recent, and this is the main justification for
choosing the theme. The systematic literature review found that the scientific
production on the topic is still dispersed and punctual, requiring expanding
this discussion to help the understanding of the settings adopted in the field
of informal work (LIMA; COSTA, 2016).
The
objective of this study is to conduct a national literature review on informal
work. Studies on informal work in the national databases that include Brazilian
scientific journals classified as A1, A2, B1 and B2 from the areas of Applied
Social Sciences, Human Sciences and Health Sciences published between the years
2008 and 2017 were reviewed.
2.
METHOD: PROCEDURES AND DELIMITATIONS
In order to show the evolution of scientific
production on informal work, a literature review of national publications of
the last 10 years was conducted. The literature review included
journals from the areas of Applied Social Sciences, Health and Human Sciences,
in the years of 2008-2017, classified as A1, A2, B1 and B2, collected in the ScIELO, PEPSIC, LILACS and CAPES databases. The research
flow is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Methodological flow used
The
choice of journals analyzed considered indexed
journals with A1, A2, B1 and B2 concepts in Qualis CAPES in the areas of
Applied Social Sciences, Human Sciences and Health Sciences. The key words
"informal work", "informal economy", "informal
sector", "informal market" and "informality" were
used. As the reality of informal work is intrinsically related to the social,
political and cultural context, we chose to analyze only studies conducted
within the Brazilian context. However, articles in foreign journals have also
been analyzed since they were published in Portuguese regarding the
Brazilian reality. Table 1 provides a general summary of the articles found and
selected.
These
were criteria for the inclusion of the articles:
(1)
empirical or theoretical study in the approach to the phenomenon;
(2)
address informal work in its various approaches;
(3)
belong to one of the areas of knowledge object of the study;
(4)
address the individual's relationship and informal work in its most diverse
forms;
(5)
have the stipulated periodicity for the bibliographic survey.
After the process of analysis of the study journals, the articles were
grouped based on the following aspects: year of publication, area of work, type
of research and data collection, instrument used, public and specificity of the
public. In principle, 440 publications were selected. Removing the repetitions
of researched base articles, 144 articles remained.
After
reading, some publications did not meet the criteria of the study, avoiding the
theme or bringing a scope that did not represent the object of study of the
research, being discarded. After using this criterion, 43 articles remained
(Table 1).
Table
1: Selected/analyzed articles
|
Keywords |
|
|||||||||
Indexed basis |
Informal Work |
Informal sector |
Informal economy |
Informal market |
Informality |
Total |
|||||
|
Fou. |
Sel. |
Fou. |
Sel. |
Enc. |
Sel. |
Enc. |
Sel. |
Enc. |
Sel. |
|
SCIELO |
20 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
100 |
8 |
15 |
PEPSIC |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
3 |
LILACS |
24 |
14 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
4 |
18 |
CAPES |
34 |
2 |
40 |
0 |
66 |
3 |
72 |
2 |
28 |
0 |
7 |
Total |
81 |
21 |
52 |
0 |
76 |
3 |
79 |
4 |
152 |
14 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
440 items found
and 43 selected |
|
Legend: FOU.= Found; SEL.= Selected
For a better understanding of the distribution of
journals in areas of knowledge, we chose to consider both the area of work of
the authors and the journal originally classified. Thus, this distribution
received greater emphasis in the area of Human Sciences, followed by the area
of Applied Social Sciences and Health Sciences, as can be seen in Table 2.
Table 2: Periodicals by area
Knowledge area |
Periodic and frequency |
Applied Social Sciences |
Paidéia (1), Revista Brasileira
de Gestão Urbana (1), Revista de Administração (1), Revista de Administração
Mackenzie (1), Caderno CRH (5), The Journal of Transport Literature (1),
Cadernos EBAPE.BR (1), Cadernos de Pesquisa (1), Revista Brasileira de
Estudos Populacionais (1), Serviço Social e Sociedade (1), Sociedade e Estado
(1), Política e Sociedade (1) |
|
|
Health Sciences |
Revista Brasileira de Educação
Física e Esporte (1), Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem (1), Revista de Saúde
Pública (1) |
|
|
Human Sciences |
Arquivos Brasileiros de
Psicologia (2), Caderno de Psicologia Social do Trabalho (4), Revista Estudos
e Pesquisas em Psicologia (1), Psicologia em Estudos (3), Psicologia e
Sociedade (2), Psicologia, Ciência e Profissão (1), Psicologia: Reflection
and Criticism (1), Revista de Psicologia Organizacional e do Trabalho (1),
Saúde e Sociedade (1), Universitás Psychology (1), CoDAS (1), Katálysis (1),
Revista CES Psicologia (1), Ciências e Saúde Coletiva (3), Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online (1) |
3.
OVERVIEW OF PUBLICATIONS ON INFORMAL
WORK IN BRAZIL
Graph
1 shows that the study of informal work remains constant over the years, with a
relatively homogeneous distribution between 2008 and 2017, a total of 14
articles (33%) between the years 2008 and 2010, 13 articles (30%) between the
years 2011 and 2013, and 16 more articles (37%) between 2014 and 2017.
Graph 1:
Articles selected by year.
Of
the areas analyzed, some had more emphasis, while
others appeared in a more punctual manner. Regarding Applied Social Sciences,
sixteen articles were included in this field of study, corresponding to 37% of
the total. The Human Sciences had a wider coverage, with more than half
of the articles (56%) classified within this area. The Health Sciences area had
only three article occurrences, corresponding to 7% of the total.
Graph 2:
Articles selected by area and year.
The
Human Sciences had a predominance in the publications, possibly because of
social psychology, which has fostered a gradual increase of research on the
subject through the sub-area of Organizational and Work Psychology. The
articles in the area of Human Sciences are focused on
the scenario of workers in an informal work regime, concerned with aspects of
work organization, difficulties and advantages in the exercise of their
activities.
The Applied Social Sciences also had a relevant number of articles,
which makes sense to understand that it is a theme that involves the individual
and the society in which he or she finds himself or herself. However, the
articles discuss perspectives related, directly or indirectly, to economic
aspects. It will be presented below how these publications are grouped in
relation to the thematic and methodological approaches and in relation to the
informal worker himself and his work.
3.1.
Thematic Areas
Seven
thematic areas were found: (1) characteristics of the activity and profile of
the informal worker; (2) meaning and sense of work/social representations; (3)
work and social relations/work contracts; (4) working conditions, health and
life; (5) worker health/loss and suffering; (6) social security and retirement;
(7) early work. These areas are described and
detailed in Table 3 and Graph 3.
Graph 3:
Selected articles by area.
Some
studies focused on a descriptive analysis of both the social profile of the
informal worker (ARAÚJO; LOMBARDI, 2013; COSTA, 2010; DUARTE; FUSCO, 2008;
PAMPLONA, 2013) and the activity performed by him (MENDES; CAVEDON, 2012;
XAVIER; FALCÃO; TORRES, 2015). Three studies focused on analyzing the types of
employment contract found in informality (AZEVEDO; TONELLI, 2014; AZEVEDO;
TONELLI; SILVA, 2015; COSTA, 2011), while three other authors analyzed the labor
and social relationships found in informal workers (COSTA; TOMASI, 2014;
LOURENÇO; BERTANI, 2009; MACIEL et.al, 2014).
Part
of the studies analyzed the social representations of work for different groups
of informal workers (DIAS et al.,
2014; IRIART et al, 2008; OLIVEIRA;
IRIART, 2008). Other studies also used psychological concepts of the meaning
and meaning of work to observe the relationship between informal workers and
their respective works (BRAGA; LIMA; MACIEL, 2015; COUTINHO et al., 2013; COUTINHO, 2009; LIMA,
RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2011; THOMÉ; TELMO; KOLLER, 2010).
The
working conditions to which they are exposed, and their consequences were also
a very representative theme, with 19% of articles in this perspective. Some of
them took a broader approach, including health and living conditions (COELHO et al, 2016; CUNHA; VIEIRA, 2009; MACIEL
et al, 2011; MENDES; AZEVÊDO, 2014;
FIQUEIREDO; SILVA; BARNABE, 2016), in addition to work. The others focused
mainly on working conditions and how these affected the individual in specific
work situations (ASSIS; MACÊDO, 2010; CARVALHO; ESCARCE; LEMOS, 2016; GOMES;
SILVEIRA, 2012).
In
relation to the losses and suffering that can be caused by informal work, some
studies have analyzed different possibilities. Cockell
and Perticarrari (2011) observed the loss of working
capacity in civil construction professionals, highlighting the fragility they
experience when in a situation of misfortune.
Kopper
(2015) analyzed the tensions at work arising from the transition of street
sellers who worked on the street when transferred to a mall. Psychic
repercussions of work were analyzed by Maronesi et al. (2014), who compared the level of
stress and overload in cancer caregivers, and by Bernardo, Nogueira
and Bull (2011), who compared the relationship between mental health and work
with groups of formal (automotive industry) and informal (street workers)
workers. Other authors also studied worker health, but more broadly: Ribeiro, Sabóia and Souza (2016); Rosa and Mattos
(2010); Takahashi et al (2012); Giongo, Monteiro and Sobrosa
(2017).
Another
group analyzed was the category "Retirement and Social Security",
which discusses the consequences of long-term work and showed concern for the
future worker. Only two articles (CINTRA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2010; SASAKI;
VASQUES-MENEZES, 2012) discuss aspects of importance to all workers such as
social security and retirement. Sasaki and Vasques-Menezes
(2012) point out an expansion of informal work and the need for the formulation
of public policies and more comprehensive procedures for affiliation to social
security, adopting contribution tables with more inviting values and that can
attract in a massive and lasting way new inclusions of individual contributors.
The
perspective of early work was also focused on the selected articles, being
related to drug use (CIRINO; ALBERTO, 2009), schooling (SOUZA; ALBERTO, 2008),
the motivation that leads parents to insert their children in this type of work
(FERRAZ; GOMES, 2012), the emotional skills found in working children in street
situation (MINERVINO et al., 2010),
and the social invisibility of children and teenagers in informal work
situation (LOURENÇO, 2014).
The association of early work with
informal work is explained by legal issues; access to formal work is forbidden
for children and adolescent teenagers up to 14 years of age. The alternative
for those who want to start working before this age is informality (LOURENÇO,
2014).
Table 3: Themes
Themes of the work |
Articles |
Retirement and Social Security |
The daily lives of retirees who continue to work informally in the
footwear industry: perceptions about retirement and current work (CINTRA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2010); Informal worker and Social Security: the case of self-employed workers
from Brasília-DF (SASAKI; VASQUES-MENEZES, 2012). |
|
|
Working conditions, health and life |
Women waste pickers: living, working and health conditions (COELHO et al, 2016); Between embroidery
and income: working conditions and health of the
labyrinthine women of Juarez Távora/Paraíba (CUNHA; VIEIRA, 2009); Precariousness of the work and life of waste
pickers in Fortaleza, CE (MACIEL et al, 2011); The work and health of the
physical educator in academies: a contradiction at the heart of the
profession (MENDES; AZEVÊDO,
2014); Public transportation: Whole-body vibration and comfort of passengers,
drivers and collectors (FIGUEIREDO; SILVA; BARNABE, 2016); The work of musicians of a
blues band under the gaze of the psychodynamics of work (ASSIS; MACÊDO, 2010); Work process,
performance and profile of professionals of an Auditive
Health Network: reference for satisfaction (CARVALHO;
ESCARCE; LEMOS, 2016); About the use of
qualitative methods in Public Health, or the lack that makes a theory (GOMES; SILVEIRA, 2012). |
|
|
Employment contracts/employment and
social relations |
The different employment contracts between
qualified Brazilian workers (AZEVEDO; TONELLI, 2014); Flexible
employment contracts: different profiles of qualified Brazilian workers (AZEVEDO; TONELLI; SILVA, 2015);
Subcontracting and informality in construction in Brazil and France (COSTA, 2011); From pedestrian to employee: rationalization and subcontracting in civil construction (COSTA; TOMASI, 2014); The work and health relationship in the footwear
sector of Franca-SP (LOURENÇO; BERTANI, 2009);
Social networks and social capital in the formation of
socio-productive networks: Study in a clothing fair in Fortaleza (MACIEL et al., 2014). |
|
|
Meaning and Meaning of Work/Social
Representations |
Surviving only through mercy: the experience of collectors of
recyclable materials (BRAGA; LIMA; MACIEL, 2015); Every day in a different house: between trajectories,
meanings and the daily work of day laborer’s (COUTINHO et al., 2013); Senses of contemporary work: the identity trajectories as
a research strategy (COUTINHO, 2009); Perceptions of children and
adolescents about their informal work (LIMA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2011); Youth labour insertion:
context and opinion on work definitions (THOMÉ; TELMO; KOLLER, 2010); Social representations
of papermakers about work and housing: the case of
Vila Chocolatão (DIAS et al., 2014); Representations of informal work and health risks among domestic workers and construction
workers (IRIART et al, 2008);
Representations of work among informal
construction workers (OLIVEIRA; IRIART, 2008). |
|
|
Profile of the informal worker and Characteristics of the activity |
Informal work, gender and race in Brazil at the beginning of the 21st
century (ARAÚJO;
LOMBARDI, 2013); Informal work: a basic structural
problem in understanding inequalities in Brazilian society (COSTA, 2010); Migration and precarious employment in two distinct contexts: São Paulo and Toritama (DUARTE; FUSCO, 2008); Labor market, informality and street trading in
São Paulo (PAMPLONA, 2013); The street
vendor activity as an urban practice in the context of cities (MENDES; CAVEDON, 2012);
Characterization of the labor activity of informal workers in Natal
beach (RN) - Brazil (XAVIER; FALCÃO; TORRES, 2015). |
|
|
Worker Health/Losses and Suffering |
Health and work of cassinu community
fishermen, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: social (in) visibility and struggle for
recognition (RIBEIRO;
SABÓIA; SOUZA, 2016); The health
and risks of fishermen and crab collectors in Guanabara Bay (ROSA; MATTOS, 2010); Job insecurity and risk of accidents in civil construction: a study based on the
Collective Labour Analysis (ACT) (TAKAHASHI et al, 2012); Portraits of informality: The fragility of social protection systems in times of
misfortune (COCKELL;
PERTICARRARI, 2011); From Camelôs To shopkeepers: the
transition from the street market to a shopping mall in Porto Alegre (KOPPER, 2015); Indicators
of stress and overload in formal and informal caregivers of cancer patients (MARONESI et al., 2014); Work and mental
health: repercussions of objective and subjective forms of precariousness (BERNARDO; NOGUEIRA; BULL, 2011); Suinoculturist: experiences of pleasure and suffering in
precarious work (GIONGO, MONTEIRO; SOBROSA, 2017). |
|
|
Early work |
Drug use among early juggling workers (CIRINO; ALBERTO, 2009); Productive restructuring, informal work and
the social invisibility of child and adolescent work (LOURENÇO, 2014); A precarious existence: the
care of the offspring in the work of collecting recyclable material (FERRAZ; GOMES, 2012); Emotions in the streets: use of the "Test of Emotions Comprehension"
in children in street work situations (MINERVINO et al., 2010); Early Work and
schooling process of children and adolescents (SOUZA; ALBERTO, 2008). |
3.2.
Methodological Approach
The analysis of the methodological approach,
data collection and instruments used offers a look at how informal work is
being studied. In the analyzed articles, the qualitative approach, which
analyzes values, beliefs, representations, habits, attitudes and opinions was
used in 74% of the studies, demonstrating the researchers' concern in
understanding the context where the phenomenon occurs, considering the
subjectivity of participants. The quantitative studies represented 19% of the
articles and seek to generate accurate and reliable measures and models capable
of predicting behaviors and attitudes towards informal work. Only 7% of the
articles used qualitative-quantitative method.
Graph 4.
Methodological approach of the articles.
Regarding
data collection, most studies (88%) adopted the type of primary collection,
making use of direct sources. The remainder (12%) used
secondary data collection, having sources such as: Pesquisa Nacional por
Amostra de Domicílio - PNAD (ARAÚJO; LOMBARDI, 2013; COSTA, 2010), Microdados
do Censo de 2000 (DUARTE; FUSCO, 2008) and Pesquisa de Emprego e Desemprego -
PED (Pamplona, 2013). A single study (MENDES; CAVEDON,
2012) used previous ethnographic studies.
In primary data
collection studies, a greater recurrence in the use of interviews was observed
(74%). Semi-structured, open interviews and life history, individual or in
groups, were used. Only one study used a focus group (COELHO et al, 2016). The technique of on-site observation was used by 38% of
the studies, questionnaires in 7% of the surveys. Only two studies used
psychometric instruments: Lipp Symptom Inventory -
ISSL and Zarit Burden Interview Protocol - ZBT (MARONESI
et al., 2014) and Emotions
Understanding Test - TCE (MINERVINO et
al., 2010).
3.3.
The Worker and Informal Work
Several professional
categories were researched: musicians (Assis & Macêdo,
2010), marketers (CARVALHO; ESCARCE; LEMOS, 2016; MACIEL et al., 2014), cleaning diarists (COUTINHO et al., 2013), labirinteiras (CUNHA;
VIEIRA, 2009), artisanal fishermen (ALVIM, 2012; RIBEIRO; SABÓIA; SOUZA, 2016), fishermen and crab collectors (ROSA & MATTOS,
2010), physical educators (MENDES; AZEVÊDO, 2014), truck drivers (FIGUEIREDO;
SILVA; BARNABE, 2016), qualified workers with higher education such as lawyers,
information technology and accounting professionals (AZEVEDO; TONELLI,
2014; AZEVEDO; TONELLI; SILVA, 2015), jugglers (COUTINHO, 2009), street vendors
(KOPPER, 2015; XAVIER; FALCÃO; TORRES, 2015), street children and adolescents (MINERVINO
et al., 2010; SOUZA; ALBERTO, 2008).
The group of workers with the highest number of studies was that of collectors
of recyclable material, with five studies (BRAGA; LIMA; MACIEL, 2015;
COELHO et al, 2016; DIAS et al.,
2014; FERRAZ; GOMES, 2012; MACIEL et al, 2011). Another group that also had
this number of studies was civil construction workers (COCKELL; PERTICARRARI,
2011; COSTA; TOMASI, 2014; COSTA, 2011; OLIVEIRA; IRIART, 2008; TAKAHASHI et
al, 2012). The footwear industry workers were the object
of four studies (CINTRA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2010; LIMA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2011;
LOURENÇO; BERTANI, 2009; LOURENÇO, 2014), the first of which was carried out
with already retired workers who were still working in the sector.
Four
articles from comparative studies between groups of workers were also found.
Bernardo, Nogueira and Bull (2011) compared the
influence of work on the mental health of formal workers in the automobile industry with
trenches, informal workers in street situations. Coutinho
(2009) compared the meaning of work for formal workers of an industrial
organization with informal workers in precarious work
situations.
Maronesi et al. (2014), stress and
work overload in formal and informal caregivers of cancer patients. Figueiredo, Silva e Barnabe
(2016), the work and health conditions of self-employed and contracted truck
drivers. The common results obtained in these studies point to the
perception of vulnerability of informal workers, mainly due to the fragile work
bond and greater susceptibility to suffering.
Two other comparative
studies were also carried out, but in contexts other than formality versus
informality. Costa (2011) analyzed the scenario of subcontracting and
informality in the civil construction sector in the comparison of France and Brazil, detecting
structural differences in both scenarios.
For Costa
(2011), the results of this research reveal similarities between the informal
situations of the two countries, respecting the specificities of each one. In
France, this type of work is basically carried out by immigrants with low
levels of education, with the institutionalized action of agencies
intermediating temporary workers in the hiring of these workers, although under
different conditions from other local workers. In Brazil, the companies themselves
allocate these workers through subcontracting or informality.
In another
selected study, Thomé, Telmo
and Koller (2010) analyzed the work for young people
aged 14 to 24 workers and non-workers. It was
found that despite the moralistic and market-oriented view of work, young
people find more job opportunities in the informal market than in the formal
labor market and that they are paid less than a minimum wage in most cases.
In relation to the age
of the research participants, most of the studies (51%) did not precisely
define the age group. However, the studies addressed adult workers. Only five
articles mentioned children, adolescents and youth (CIRINO; ALBERTO, 2009;
LIMA; RIBEIRO; ANDRADE, 2011; MINERVINO et
al., 2010; SOUZA; ALBERTO, 2008; THOMÉ; TELMO; KOLLER, 2010), while only
two studies specifically cited adults (CUNHA; VIEIRA, 2009; DIAS et al., 2014).
4.
DISCUSSION
The cutout
made for this study showed that only 43 articles, out of a total of 440
previously researched, and included in the original database, consisted of
studies on the work relationship with informal workers. The small portion of
research on informal work found in the context of Brazilian work, corroborates
what was highlighted by Sasaki (2009) and Sasaki and Vasques-Menezes
(2012).
For the
authors, the informal sector in question is under-represented in national labor
surveys and, in general, the factors that led to their choice or the reason for
their permanence are underestimated. This indicates a tendency to show the
problems of informal work and little concern to better define it, or even
analyze its participation in the production of services and the economy of
society as a vector of foreign exchange production.
The
humanities have a greater share of publications on informal work, highlighting
the working conditions present in this sector and the significance of this work
for workers. In general, the thematic profile of the studies on informal
workers who used samples from the informal sector shows concern with the labor
relations themselves and, especially, with the precariousness of work.
Although
most of the articles analyzed present a discussion of the results that
considers the specificities of the work context in the informal sector, a small
portion does not make this association. This possibly leads to gaps or gaps in
the construction of knowledge about informal work. The selected articles
related to themes such as "well-being", "meaning of work"
and "job satisfaction", did not deepen discussions about the sector,
pointing to the difficulty of theoretical reflections and instruments of
measures aimed at the informal sector.
It is
interesting to point out that the precariousness of work is discussed almost as
a prerogative of informal work due to the generalization of a portion of this
type of work with street sellers, jugglers at traffic lights, scrap pickers,
among others. The development of the productive sphere through informal
activity has become more attractive, and today it is a reality for many workers
who opt for a more flexible and autonomous work due to their personal needs as
small children, specific skills, entrepreneurship capacity and high cost of
formality. The informal sector has also come to include small units such as
small family businesses.
This conception
is discussed in the studies of Cacciamali (2000) and Abramovay et al.
(2003), and permeates the construction of the Urban Informal Economy (ECINF)
research conducted by IBGE in the years 1997 and 2003 in households and
establishments (Machado, Oliveira and Antigo, 2008). These aspects are not
explored in the articles published in recent years, which demonstrates a
direction or myopia in the perception of reality currently present in the
Brazilian social scenario.
In relation
to the methodological scenario, the studies in this context have followed the
general trend of research in micro behavior in Brazil, in which little use of
experiments is observed (BORGES-ANDRADE; PAGOTTO, 2010). Still in relation to
the method, the qualitative approach was the most used.
The fact
that the interviews represent the most used method for data collection is not
compatible with the micro behavior articles in general - which use more
questionnaires (BORGES-ANDRADE; PAGOTTO, 2010), but is consistent with the
predominance of the qualitative approach. It should also be noted that the on-site observation is more
representative in informal labor studies than in general publications on the
labor market and workers, which may be justified by the greater need for
immersion in the reality of informal workers and in the smaller number of
official documents for this type of work.
5.
CLOSING REMARKS
The analysis of the
scientific production of a given area of knowledge is an important contribution
to the scientific community and it is becoming more and more an object of
investigation. The contribution of studies of this type lies in the generation
of discussions about gaps, difficulties and limits encountered by the various
researchers in their field of knowledge, in addition to fostering discussions
and promoting debates about the need for new research on a given theme or
approach.
The present literature
review makes a cut of the national production of the last 10 years of its
object of analysis, informal work. The data and information analyzed have some
limitations. The collection and organization were based on complete articles
published in the main databases of national journals, not including
international databases. In addition, it considered the last 10 years to carry
out its analyses as a period, although these periods have a good temporality
and the journals always include psychology and administration, areas that host
the main scientific articles on PO&T.
The analysis shows that
studies on informal work are still incipient. Several researchers have treated
informal work as something marginalized, with minimal gains for the worker and
no gains for the society in which he is inserted. Studies point to a labor
force without specialization and that, due to economic situations and lack of
formal employment, "fall into informality".
In the same way, they
indicate that informal work does not contribute economically and socially to
the community in which it is inserted, since, among other things, it does not
pay taxes and does not subsidize the formal sources of welfare and social
protection. Although some studies indicate that there may be benefits and
satisfaction in carrying out informal work, in general, scientific production
points to work that is denigrated and harmful to all those involved in carrying
it out.
Thus, there is a need to
expand the studies on the topic, addressing aspects that are still little or no
explored, such as job satisfaction of informal workers, their well-being,
health and quality of life. These existing gaps in the study of informal work
play an important role in its definition, seeking to understand its real role
in contemporary society and also the existence of workers who choose to be in
this market and who are satisfied with their choice, and informal work can
therefore be a possibility.
In the same sense, there
are still no specific instruments that can be applied to research that seeks an
analysis of the work-labor relationship with a focus on informal workers. It is
important to think of new research instruments that effectively cover the
characteristics inherent to informal work, and these can provide a more
effective study on key topics such as commitment, work overload, drawings at
work, among others.
REFERENCES
ABRAMOVAY, R. (2003) Small entrepreneurship markets in Brazil. In: Poverty and markets
in Brazil: an analysis of public policy initiatives. Brasília. CEPAL/DFID,
233-311.
ALVIM, R. G. (2012) The living conditions of
artisanal fishermen in Rua da Palha.
Acta Scientiarum.
Human and Social Sciences, v. 34, n. 1, p. 101-110.
ARAÚJO, A. M. C.; LOMBARDI, M. R.
(2013) Informal work, gender and race in Brazil at the beginning of the 21st century. Cadernos de Pesquisa,
v. 43, n. 149, p. 452-477.
ASSIS, D. T. F.;MACÊDO, K. B. (2010) The work of
musicians of a blues band under the eyes of the psychodynamics of work. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, v. 10,
n. 1, p. 52-64.
AZEVEDO, M. C.; TONELLI, M. J. (2014) The different employment
contracts between qualified Brazilian workers. Revista Mackenzie de Administração, v. 15, n. 3, p. 191-220
AZEVEDO, M. C.; TONELLI, M. J. & SILVA, A. L. (2015). Flexible work contracts: different profiles of qualified Brazilian workers. Revista de Administração, São Paulo, 50(3), 277-291.
BERNARDO, M. H., NOGUEIRA,
F. R. C.; BÜLl, S. (2011) Work and mental health: repercussions of forms of objective and
subjective precariousness. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia,
v. 63(spe),
p. 83-93. Access: 05.05.2017. Available on:
http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S180952672011000300009&lng=en&tlng=en
Access on 16 Oct. 2018.
BORGES-ANDRADE, J. E.; PAGOTTO, C. P. (2010)
The State of the Art of Brazilian Research in Work and Organizational
Psychology. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, v. 26(spe), p. 37-50.
Avaliable on https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722010000500004. Access on 21 nov.
2019.
BRAGA, N. L.;
LIMA.; D. M. A.; MACIEL, R. H. (2015) Surviving only on mercy: the experience of waste pickers. Revista CES Psicologia,
v. 9, n. 1, p. 122-134.
CACCIAMALI, M. C. (2000) Globalization and the
process of informality. Economia e Sociedade,
v. 9, n. 1, p. 153-174.
CARDOSO, A. (2013) Essays of sociology of the Brazilian labor market. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora.
CARVALHO, S. A. S.; ESCARCE, A. G.; LEMOS, S. M. A. (2016) Work process, performance and profile of professionals of an Auditory Health Network: reference for satisfaction. CoDAS, v. 28, n. 4, p. 429-438.
CINTRA, T. S.; RIBEIRO, D. de F.; ANDRADE, A. S. (2010) The daily lives of retirees who continue to work informally in the footwear industry: perceptions about retirement and current work. Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho, São Paulo: v. 13, n. 2, p. 277-287.
CIRINO, D. C. S.;
ALBERTO, M. F. (2009) Drug
use among early juggling workers. Psicologia em Estudo, v. 3, n. 14, p.
547-555.
COCKELL, F. F.;
PERTICARRARI, D. (2011) Portraits of informality: the fragility of social
protection systems in times of misfortune. Ciência e
Saúde Coletiva, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1709-1718.
COELHO, A. P. F.;
BECK, C. L. C.; FERNANDES, M. N. S.; FREITAS, N. Q.; PRESTES, F. C.; TONEL, J.
Z. (2016) Women waste
pickers: living, working and health conditions. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem,
v. 37, n. 3, p. e57321. Epub September 29.
COSTA, L. R.
(2011) Subcontracting and informality
in civil construction in Brazil and France. Caderno
CRH, v. 24, n. 62, p. 413-434.
COSTA, M. S. (2010) Informal work: a basic
structural problem in the understanding of inequalities in Brazilian society. Caderno CRH, v. 23, n. 58, p. 171-190.
COSTA,
L. R.; TOMASI, A. P. N. (2014) From pedestrian to employee: rationalization and
subcontracting in civil construction. Caderno
CRH, v. 27, n. 71,
p. 347-365.
COUTINHO, M. C.
(2009) Senses of contemporary work: the
identity trajectories as a research strategy. Cadernos
de Psicologia Social do Trabalho,
v. 12, n. 2, p. 189-202.
COUTINHO,
M. C.; BORGES, R. C. P.; GRAF, L. P.; SILVA, A. S. (2013) Every day in a
different house: between trajectories, senses and the daily work of day labourers. Universitas Psychologica, v. 12, n. 4, p. 1125-1138.
CUNHA, T. B.; VIEIRA, S. B. (2009) Between
embroidery and income: working conditions and health of labyrinthine Juarez Távora/Paraíba. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 2009, v. 29, n. 2, p. 258-275. ISSN
1414-9893
DIAS, B. C. C.;
CHERFÊN, V. P. R. F.; RAUPP, L. M.; MILNITISKY-SAPIRO, C. (2014) Social representations of
papermakers about work and housing: the case of Vila Chocolatão.
Psicologia & Sociedade,
v. 26(n. spe.), p. 193-200.
DUARTE, R. S.; FUSCO, W.
(2008) Migration and precarious employment in two distinct contexts: São Paulo
and Toritama. Caderno
CRH, v. 21, n. 53,
p. 335-345.
FERRAZ,
L.; GOMES, M. H. A. (2012) A precarious
existence: the care of the offspring in the work of collecting recyclable
material. Sociedade e
Estado, v. 27, n. 3, p. 652-662.
FIGUEIREDO, M. A. M.; SILVA, L. F.; BARNABE, T. L. (2016) Collective
transportation: whole-body vibration and comfort of passengers, drivers and
collectors. Journal of Transport
Literature, Manaus, v. 10, n. 1, p. 35-39,
Mar. 2016. Available from
<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-10312016000100035&lng=en&nrm=iso>.
access on 10 May 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v10n1a7.
GIONGO, C. R.;
MONTEIRO, J. K.; SOBROSA, G. M. R. (2017) Pig farmer: experiences of pleasure and
suffering in precarious work. Psicologia & Sociedade, n. 29, p. e147648.
GOMES, M. H. A.; SILVEIRA, C. (2012) About the use of qualitative methods in Public
Health, or the lack that makes a theory. Revista de Saúde Pública, v. 46, n. 1, p. 160-165.
INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION -
ILO. (1972) Employment, incomes and
equality: a strategic for increasing productive employment in Kenya.
Geneva: ILO, 1972.
INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION
(BRAZIL). (2013) The ILO in Latin
America and the Caribbean: Progress and Perspectives. Lima: ILO. Retrieved
on June 15, 2015, from Available in:
http://www.oitbrasil.org.br/sites/default/fil-es/topic/gender/doc/avan%C3%A7oseperspecti
vas2013_1041.pdf.
INSTITUTE
OF APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH (IPEA). (2015) Labour Market Bulletin. Brasília, IPEA. Available on http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/mercadodetrabalho/bmt_58_completo.pdf. Access on 15 jun. 2015.
IRIART, J. A. B.;
OLIVEIRA, R. B.; XAVIER, S. S.; COSTA, A. M. S.; ARAUJO, G. R.; SANTANA, V. S.
(2008) Representations
of informal work and health risks among domestic and construction workers. Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 13, n. 1,
p. 165-174.
KALLEBERG, A. L. (2009) The growth of
precarious work: a global challenge. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 24, n. 69.
KOPPER, M. (2015) From Camelôs to
Tenants: the transition from the street market to a shopping mall in Porto
Alegre. Caderno
CRH, v. 28, n. 75, p. 591-605.
KREIN, J. D.; PRONI, M. W. (2010) Informal economy: conceptual and theoretical
aspects. Brasília: ILO, 1.
LIMA, T. B.; COSTA, M. S. (2016) Informal work: a systematic review of Brazilian literature in the area of Administration between 2004 and 2013. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 14, n. 2, p. 310-324.
LIMA, M. B.; RIBEIRO, D. F.; ANDRADE, A. S. (2011) Perceptions of children and adolescents about their informal work. Psicologia em Revista, (Belo Horizonte); v. 17, n. 1, p. 48-66, apr.
LOURENÇO, E. Â. S.; BERTANI, I. F. (2009) The
work and health relationship in the footwear sector of Franca-SP. Katálysis, v. 12, n. 2, p. 152-160.
LOURENÇO, E. Â. S. (2014) Restructuring productive, informal work and the social invisibility of
child and adolescent work. Serviço Social & Sociedade, v. 1, n. 18, p. 294-317.
MACHADO,
A. F.; OLIVEIRA, A. M. H. C.; ANTIGO, M. (2008) Evolution
of the income differential between the formal and informal sectors in Brazil: the role of unobserved characteristics.
Revista de Economia Contemporânea, v. 12, n. 2, p. 355-388.
MACIEL, R. H.; MATOS, T. G. R.; BORSOI, I. C. F.; MENDES, A. B. C.; SIEBRA, P. T.; MOTORCYCLE, C. A. (2011) Precariousness of the work and life of waste pickers in Fortaleza, CE. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, v. 63(spe), p. 71-82.
MACIEL, R.; SANTOS, J.; MATOS, T.; MAIA, L.; FONTENELLE, M. (2014) Social networks and social capital in the formation of socio-productive networks: Study in a confectionary fair in Fortaleza. Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho, v. 17, n. 1, p. 33-47.
MARONESI, L. C.; SILVA, N. R.; CANTU, S.; SANTOS, A. R.
(2014) Indicators
of stress and overload in formal and informal caregivers of cancer patients. Estudos e
Pesquisas em Psicologia, Rio de
Janeiro: v. 14, n. 3, p. 877-892.
MENDES, A.; AZEVEDO, P. (2014). The work and health of the physical educator in academies: a contradiction at the heart of the profession. Revista Brasileira De Educação Física e Esporte, v. 28, n. 4, p. 599-615.
MENDES, L.; CAVEDON, N. R. (2012) The activity of street vendor as an urban practice in the context of cities. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, v. 4, n. 1, p. 123-140. Available on: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/Urbe/article/view/5497. Access on 04 jun. 2018.
MINERVINO, C. A. S. M.; DIAS, M. G. B. B. B.;
SILVEIRA, N. J. D.; ROAZZI, A. (2010) Emotions in the streets: use of the "Test of
Emotions Comprehension" in children in street work situation. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, v. 23, n. 2, p. 354-361.
NORONHA, E. G.
(2003) "Informal", illegal, unfair: perceptions of the labor market
in Brazil. RBCS
- Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais,
v. 18, n. 53, p. 111-179. Available on
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092003000300007. Access on 15 June 2015.
OLIVEIRA, R. P.;
IRIART, J. A. B. (2008) Representation
of work among informal construction workers. Psicologia em Estudo, v. 13,
n. 3, p. 437-445.
PAMPLONA, J. B.
(2013) Labor market, informality and
itinerant trade in São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais, v. 30, n. 1, p. 225-249.
PASTORE, J. (2006)
The worst is informality. Available on
http://www.josepastore.com.br/artigos/ti/ti_015.htm. Access on 05 jun. 2015.
REZENDE, F.;
TAFNER, P. (Editores) (2005) Brazil:
the state of a nation; summary edition. Rio de
Janeiro: IPEA, 2005. 97 p.: il.
RIBEIRO, C. R. B.; SABÓIA, V. M.; SOUZA, D. K. (2016) Health and work of cassinu community fishermen, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: social (in) visibility and struggle for recognition. Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online, v. 8, n. 1, p. 3957-3967.
ROSA, M. F. M.; MATTOS, U. A. O. (2010) The
health and risks of fishermen and crab collectors in Guanabara Bay. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 15 (Sup 1.1), p. 1543-1552.
SASAKI, M. A.; VASQUES-MENEZES, I. (2012)
Informal worker and Social Welfare: the case of self-employed workers in
Brasília-DF. Política & Sociedade, v. 11, n. 21.
SASAKI, M. A. (2009) Informal work: choice or scarcity of jobs. Study on the profile of the
self-employed. Dissertation (Master in Social and Organization Psychology)
Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
SATO, L. (2013) Recovering lost time:
psychology and unregulated work. Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho, v. 16
(SPE), p. 99-110.
SOUZA, O. M. C. G.; ALBERTO, M. F. P. (2008) Early work and schooling process for children and adolescents. Psicologia em Estudo, v. 13, n. 4, p. 713-722.
TAKAHASHI, M. A. B. C. C.; SILVA, R. C.; LACORTE, L. E. C.;
CEVERNY, G. C. O.; VILELA, R. A. G. (2012) Precarization of work
and risk of accidents in civil construction: a study based on the Collective
Analysis of Work (ACT). Saúde e Sociedade,
v. 21, n. 4, p. 976-988.
THOMÉ, L. D.; TELMO, A.
Q.; KOLLER, S. H. (2010) Youth labour insertion:
context and opinion on work definitions. Paidéia, Ribeirão Preto: v.
20, n. 46, p. 175-185.
ULYSSEA, G. (2006) Informality in the labor
market: a review of the literature. Revista de Economia Política, v. 26, n. 4, p.
596-618. Available on:
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572006000400008.
Access on 15 jun. 2015.
XAVIER, D. G. P.; FALCÃO, J.
T. R.; TORRES, C. C. (2015) Characterization
of the work activity of informal workers on the beach of Natal (RN) - Brazil. Cadernos de Psicologia
Social, v. 1, n. 18, p. 29-45.